Adeline Tan1, Jason D C Yin2, Linda W L Tan2, Rob M van Dam3, Yan Yi Cheung4, Chi-Hang Lee4. 1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Jurong Health Services, Singapore. Electronic address: ayytan@gmail.com. 2. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 3. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. 4. Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The STOP-Bang questionnaire was developed as a quick and simple screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in preoperative clinics. We aimed to evaluate the validity of the STOP-Bang questionnaire to predict moderate-to-severe and severe OSA in the general population. METHODS: A sample of 242 subjects selected from a population-based cohort in Singapore completed home-based sleep testing with a type 3 monitor. Subjects were asked to complete the STOP questionnaire while body mass index (BMI), age, neck circumference, and sex were recorded. A score of ≥3 on the questionnaire indicated high risk of OSA. RESULTS: A total of 68 subjects (28.1%) and 26 subjects (10.7%) had an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of ≥15 and ≥30 events per hour, respectively. Of the subjects, 89 (36.8%) were classified as high risk based on the questionnaire. The sensitivity of a STOP-Bang score of ≥3 was 66.2% to detect AHI ≥15 and 69.2% to detect AHI ≥30. The specificities were 74.7% and 67.1%, respectively. The negative predictive values were 85% for moderate-to-severe OSA and 94.8% for severe OSA. The corresponding positive predictive values were 50.6% and 20.2%, respectively. Using BMI cutoffs of 30 and 27.5 for Asians compared to the original cutoff of 35 did not improve the questionnaire performance significantly. CONCLUSION: The STOP-Bang questionnaire can be used as a screening tool in the general population in view of its moderate sensitivity and high negative predictive value for subjects with moderate-to-severe and severe OSA. The cutoff of BMI >35 can be used in Asians, as lower BMI cutoffs did not improve questionnaire performance.
OBJECTIVE: The STOP-Bang questionnaire was developed as a quick and simple screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in preoperative clinics. We aimed to evaluate the validity of the STOP-Bang questionnaire to predict moderate-to-severe and severe OSA in the general population. METHODS: A sample of 242 subjects selected from a population-based cohort in Singapore completed home-based sleep testing with a type 3 monitor. Subjects were asked to complete the STOP questionnaire while body mass index (BMI), age, neck circumference, and sex were recorded. A score of ≥3 on the questionnaire indicated high risk of OSA. RESULTS: A total of 68 subjects (28.1%) and 26 subjects (10.7%) had an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of ≥15 and ≥30 events per hour, respectively. Of the subjects, 89 (36.8%) were classified as high risk based on the questionnaire. The sensitivity of a STOP-Bang score of ≥3 was 66.2% to detect AHI ≥15 and 69.2% to detect AHI ≥30. The specificities were 74.7% and 67.1%, respectively. The negative predictive values were 85% for moderate-to-severe OSA and 94.8% for severe OSA. The corresponding positive predictive values were 50.6% and 20.2%, respectively. Using BMI cutoffs of 30 and 27.5 for Asians compared to the original cutoff of 35 did not improve the questionnaire performance significantly. CONCLUSION: The STOP-Bang questionnaire can be used as a screening tool in the general population in view of its moderate sensitivity and high negative predictive value for subjects with moderate-to-severe and severe OSA. The cutoff of BMI >35 can be used in Asians, as lower BMI cutoffs did not improve questionnaire performance.
Authors: Catherine C Gao; Ekta Kapoor; Melissa C Lipford; Virginia M Miller; Darrell R Schroeder; Kristin C Mara; Stephanie S Faubion Journal: Menopause Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Britta D P J Maas; Tjasse D Bruintjes; Hester J van der Zaag-Loonen; Roeland B van Leeuwen Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: C Kastoer; L B L Benoist; M Dieltjens; B Torensma; L H de Vries; P E Vonk; M J L Ravesloot; N de Vries Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Mitchell G Miglis; Logan Schneider; Paul Kim; Joseph Cheung; Lynn Marie Trotti Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 4.062