Emilia Sundström1, Steen M Jensen2, Ulla-Britt Diamant2, Annika Rydberg1. 1. a Department of Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics , Umeå University , Umeå , Sweden. 2. b Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine , Heart Centre, Umeå University , Umeå , Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) treatment is effective among long QT syndrome (LQTS) patients at a high risk of sudden cardiac death. Previous studies show that the international guidelines are not always followed, and that risk stratification may be based on genotype rather than individual risk profile. We analysed data from the Swedish ICD & Pacemaker Registry and medical records to examine how international guidelines were followed with regards to phenotype and genotype. METHODS AND RESULTS: ICD treatment was used in 150 Swedish LQTS patients from 1989-2013. The annual number of implantations increased over the study period. A total of 109 patients were included in the analysis. Most patients (91%) were symptomatic before the implantation. Seventy percent of patients who received ICD treatment met the 2006 Class I or Class IIa recommendations for LQTS treatment. Thirty-one percent of the LQT3 patients received ICD treatment despite being asymptomatic. Among LQT1 patients, 45% received ICD treatment after syncope despite beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty percent of Swedish LQTS patients with ICD received the treatment without a strong indication based on international guidelines. LQT3 patients were over-represented among asymptomatic patients. Many LQT1 patients received ICD despite the known effect of beta-blockers in this group.
OBJECTIVES: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) treatment is effective among long QT syndrome (LQTS) patients at a high risk of sudden cardiac death. Previous studies show that the international guidelines are not always followed, and that risk stratification may be based on genotype rather than individual risk profile. We analysed data from the Swedish ICD & Pacemaker Registry and medical records to examine how international guidelines were followed with regards to phenotype and genotype. METHODS AND RESULTS:ICD treatment was used in 150 Swedish LQTS patients from 1989-2013. The annual number of implantations increased over the study period. A total of 109 patients were included in the analysis. Most patients (91%) were symptomatic before the implantation. Seventy percent of patients who received ICD treatment met the 2006 Class I or Class IIa recommendations for LQTS treatment. Thirty-one percent of the LQT3patients received ICD treatment despite being asymptomatic. Among LQT1patients, 45% received ICD treatment after syncope despite beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty percent of Swedish LQTS patients with ICD received the treatment without a strong indication based on international guidelines. LQT3patients were over-represented among asymptomatic patients. Many LQT1patients received ICD despite the known effect of beta-blockers in this group.
Authors: Kyung Jin Ahn; Mi Kyoung Song; Sang Yun Lee; Ja Kyoung Yoon; Gi Beom Kim; Seil Oh; Eun Jung Bae Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2022-10 Impact factor: 3.101