Literature DB >> 27936711

New Parameters for Higher Accuracy in the Computation of Binding Free Energy Differences upon Alanine Scanning Mutagenesis on Protein-Protein Interfaces.

Inês C M Simões1, Inês P D Costa1, João T S Coimbra1, Maria J Ramos1, Pedro A Fernandes1.   

Abstract

Knowing how proteins make stable complexes enables the development of inhibitors to preclude protein-protein (P:P) binding. The identification of the specific interfacial residues that mostly contribute to protein binding, denominated as hot spots, is thus critical. Here, we refine an in silico alanine scanning mutagenesis protocol, based on a residue-dependent dielectric constant version of the Molecular Mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area method. We have used a large data set of structurally diverse P:P complexes to redefine the residue-dependent dielectric constants used in the determination of binding free energies. The accuracy of the method was validated through comparison with experimental data, considering the per-residue P:P binding free energy (ΔΔGbinding) differences upon alanine mutation. Different protocols were tested, i.e., a geometry optimization protocol and three molecular dynamics (MD) protocols: (1) one using explicit water molecules, (2) another with an implicit solvation model, and (3) a third where we have carried out an accelerated MD with explicit water molecules. Using a set of protein dielectric constants (within the range from 1 to 20) we showed that the dielectric constants of 7 for nonpolar and polar residues and 11 for charged residues (and histidine) provide optimal ΔΔGbinding predictions. An overall mean unsigned error (MUE) of 1.4 kcal mol-1 relative to the experiment was achieved in 210 mutations only with geometry optimization, which was further reduced with MD simulations (MUE of 1.1 kcal mol-1 for the MD employing explicit solvent). This recalibrated method allows for a better computational identification of hot spots, avoiding expensive and time-consuming experiments or thermodynamic integration/ free energy perturbation/ uBAR calculations, and will hopefully help new drug discovery campaigns in their quest of searching spots of interest for binding small drug-like molecules at P:P interfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27936711     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  11 in total

Review 1.  The chemistry of snake venom and its medicinal potential.

Authors:  Ana L Oliveira; Matilde F Viegas; Saulo L da Silva; Andreimar M Soares; Maria J Ramos; Pedro A Fernandes
Journal:  Nat Rev Chem       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 34.571

2.  Computational analysis of hot spots and binding mechanism in the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction.

Authors:  Dading Huang; Wei Wen; Xiao Liu; Yang Li; John Z H Zhang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 3.  Recent Developments and Applications of the MMPBSA Method.

Authors:  Changhao Wang; D'Artagnan Greene; Li Xiao; Ruxi Qi; Ray Luo
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2018-01-10

4.  Exploring the potential of 3D Zernike descriptors and SVM for protein-protein interface prediction.

Authors:  Sebastian Daberdaku; Carlo Ferrari
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Saturation Mutagenesis by Efficient Free-Energy Calculation.

Authors:  Zuzana Jandova; Daniel Fast; Martina Setz; Maria Pechlaner; Chris Oostenbrink
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  SKEMPI 2.0: an updated benchmark of changes in protein-protein binding energy, kinetics and thermodynamics upon mutation.

Authors:  Justina Jankauskaite; Brian Jiménez-García; Justas Dapkunas; Juan Fernández-Recio; Iain H Moal
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Inactive-to-Active Transition of Human Thymidine Kinase 1 Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Samanta Makurat; Zoe Cournia; Janusz Rak
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  Integrated structure-based protein interface prediction.

Authors:  M Walder; E Edelstein; M Carroll; S Lazarev; J E Fajardo; A Fiser; R Viswanathan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  Computational Investigation on the p53-MDM2 Interaction Using the Potential of Mean Force Study.

Authors:  Pundarikaksha Das; Venkata Satish Kumar Mattaparthi
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-04-10

10.  Reliable In Silico Ranking of Engineered Therapeutic TCR Binding Affinities with MMPB/GBSA.

Authors:  Rory M Crean; Christopher R Pudney; David K Cole; Marc W van der Kamp
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.