Literature DB >> 27936426

Statistical comparison of mass spectra for identification of amphetamine-type stimulants.

Melissa A Bodnar Willard1, Victoria L McGuffin2, Ruth Waddell Smith3.   

Abstract

A method for the statistical comparison of mass spectral data is demonstrated for applications in controlled substance analysis. The method uses an unequal variance t-test at each mass-to-charge ratio in the scan range to determine if two spectra are statistically associated or discriminated. If the two spectra are associated, a random-match probability is calculated to estimate the likelihood that the mass spectral fragmentation pattern in question occurs by random chance alone. If the two spectra are discriminated, the fragment ions responsible for the discrimination are determined. In this work, mass spectral data from case samples containing amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), phentermine, and psilocin were investigated. All spectra were collected in an accredited forensic laboratory using routine methods for controlled substance analysis. Using the statistical method, spectra of case samples were statistically associated to the corresponding reference standard at the 99.9% confidence level. In these instances, random-match probabilities ranged from 10-39 to 10-29, indicating the probability that the characteristic fragmentation pattern occurred by random chance is extremely small. Further, spectra of case samples were discriminated from other reference standards at the 99.9% or 99.0% confidence level, with 1-26 ions responsible for discrimination in each comparison.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphetamine-type stimulants; Controlled substance identification; Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; Mass spectral comparison

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27936426     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  4 in total

1.  Mass spectral similarity mapping applied to fentanyl analogs.

Authors:  A S Moorthy; A J Kearsley; W G Mallard; W E Wallace
Journal:  Forensic Chem       Date:  2020

Review 2.  Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.

Authors:  Nicole S Jones; Jeffrey H Comparin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2020-05-24

3.  Combining Fragment-Ion and Neutral-Loss Matching during Mass Spectral Library Searching: A New General Purpose Algorithm Applicable to Illicit Drug Identification.

Authors:  Arun S Moorthy; William E Wallace; Anthony J Kearsley; Dmitrii V Tchekhovskoi; Stephen E Stein
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Utilization of Machine Learning for the Differentiation of Positional NPS Isomers with Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bonetti; Saer Samanipour; Arian C van Asten
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.986

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.