Literature DB >> 27936339

Evaluation of a short home blood pressure measurement in an outpatient population of hypertensives.

Silvia Di Monaco1, Franco Rabbia1, Michele Covella1, Chiara Fulcheri1, Elena Berra1, Marco Pappaccogli1, Elisa Perlo1, Chiara Bertello1, Franco Veglio1.   

Abstract

Current guidelines suggest the use of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) as a method complementary to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for the identification of arterial hypertension. A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of a short HBPM schedule compared with ABPM, and to evaluate to what extent HBPM can replace ABPM. A total of 310 patients who performed ABPM in our hypertension clinic were enrolled between November 2011 and June 2015. They performed a 4-day HBPM schedule, with two readings in the morning and two readings at night. Results showed a moderate correlation between HBPM and ABPM (r = 0.59 for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and r = 0.72 for diastolic blood pressure (DBP)) and moderate diagnostic agreement (area under curve: 0.791 for SBP and 0.857 for DBP). No significant difference was found between first-day average and those of days 2-4. Diagnostic agreement between the two techniques was moderate, supporting the notion that HBPM cannot replace ABPM in the general population. However, we identified two HBPM thresholds, 123/75 and 144/87 mm Hg, through which subjects who may not require further ABPM can be identified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial hypertension; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; blood pressure measurement; diagnostic algorithm; home blood pressure monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27936339     DOI: 10.1080/10641963.2016.1200600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens        ISSN: 1064-1963            Impact factor:   1.749


  2 in total

1.  Validity of self blood pressure measurement in the control of the hypertensive patient: factors involved.

Authors:  Arleen De León-Robert; Juan José Gascón-Cánovas; José Joaquín Antón-Botella; Isabel María Hidalgo-García; Carmen López-Alegría; Yoalys Dilvani Pérez-Cabrera; Heidy Merari Campusano-Castellanos
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.298

2.  bp: Blood pressure analysis in R.

Authors:  John Schwenck; Naresh M Punjabi; Irina Gaynanova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.