Literature DB >> 2793609

The relation among hearing loss, sensory cell loss and tuning characteristics in the chinchilla.

R I Davis1, W A Ahroon, R P Hamernik.   

Abstract

Evoked-potential tuning curves were obtained on over 150 chinchillas before and after acoustic overstimulation in order to relate the effects of changes in frequency selectivity to sensory cell loss over a wide range of hearing loss. Pre- and post-exposure measures of auditory thresholds and masked thresholds (simultaneous tone-on-tone paradigm) were obtained in each animal at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0 and 11.2 kHz, using the auditory evoked potential recorded from the inferior colliculus. Three tuning curve variables (Q10dB, low-frequency slope and high-frequency slope) were compared to the amount of noise-induced permanent threshold shift and to the percent sensory cell loss produced by a variety of noise exposures. Based upon large sample averages, frequencies showing permanent threshold shifts in excess of 10 dB also showed statistically significant differences between pre- and post-exposure measures of all three tuning curve variables. Shifts of less than 10 dB were not accompanied by statistically significant changes in the tuning curve variables. The percentage of outer hair cell loss, and percentage change in tuning curve characteristics showed systematic and parallel increases as threshold shifts increased at all probe tone frequencies except 8.0 and 11.2 kHz. In general, the results were consistent in showing that there is a systematic change in the variables which define the quality of tuning as hearing loss progressively increases and that these changes are clearly related to outer hair cell losses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2793609     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90173-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

1.  Tuning of SFOAEs Evoked by Low-Frequency Tones Is Not Compatible with Localized Emission Generation.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27

2.  Multivariate DPOAE metrics for identifying changes in hearing: perspectives from ototoxicity monitoring.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Marilyn F Dille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Somatic motility and hair bundle mechanics, are both necessary for cochlear amplification?

Authors:  Anthony W Peng; Anthony J Ricci
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Plasticity of serotonergic innervation of the inferior colliculus in mice following acoustic trauma.

Authors:  Melissa A Papesh; Laura M Hurley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Selective Inner Hair Cell Dysfunction in Chinchillas Impairs Hearing-in-Noise in the Absence of Outer Hair Cell Loss.

Authors:  Edward Lobarinas; Richard Salvi; Dalian Ding
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-21

6.  Effect of Selective Carboplatin-Induced Inner Hair Cell Loss on Temporal Integration in Chinchillas.

Authors:  Monica Trevino; Celia D Escabi; Andie Zang; Karen Pawlowski; Edward Lobarinas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-04-04

7.  Insensitivity of the audiogram to carboplatin induced inner hair cell loss in chinchillas.

Authors:  Edward Lobarinas; Richard Salvi; Dalian Ding
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Using Cochlear Microphonic Potentials to Localize Peripheral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  The chinchilla animal model for hearing science and noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Monica Trevino; Edward Lobarinas; Amanda C Maulden; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.