Literature DB >> 27935731

Two Bayesian tests of the GLOMOsys Model.

Sarahanne M Field1, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers2, Ben R Newell3, René Zeelenberg4, Don van Ravenzwaaij5.   

Abstract

Priming is arguably one of the key phenomena in contemporary social psychology. Recent retractions and failed replication attempts have led to a division in the field between proponents and skeptics and have reinforced the importance of confirming certain priming effects through replication. In this study, we describe the results of 2 preregistered replication attempts of 1 experiment by Förster and Denzler (2012). In both experiments, participants first processed letters either globally or locally, then were tested using a typicality rating task. Bayes factor hypothesis tests were conducted for both experiments: Experiment 1 (N = 100) yielded an indecisive Bayes factor of 1.38, indicating that the in-lab data are 1.38 times more likely to have occurred under the null hypothesis than under the alternative. Experiment 2 (N = 908) yielded a Bayes factor of 10.84, indicating strong support for the null hypothesis that global priming does not affect participants' mean typicality ratings. The failure to replicate this priming effect challenges existing support for the GLOMOsys model. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27935731     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  1 in total

1.  Can training change attentional breadth? Failure to find transfer effects.

Authors:  Lin Fang; Kristof Hoorelbeke; Lynn Bruyneel; Lies Notebaert; Colin MacLeod; Rudi De Raedt; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-02-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.