| Literature DB >> 27935446 |
Shein-Chung Chow1, Fuyu Song2, He Bai3.
Abstract
For the assessment of biosimilar products, the FDA recommends a stepwise approach for obtaining the totality-of-the-evidence for assessing biosimilarity between a proposed biosimilar product and its corresponding innovative biologic product. The stepwise approach starts with analytical studies for assessing similarity in critical quality attributes (CQAs), which are relevant to clinical outcomes at various stages of the manufacturing process. For CQAs that are the most relevant to clinical outcomes, the FDA requires an equivalence test be performed for similarity assessment based on an equivalence acceptance criterion (EAC) that is obtained using a single test value of some selected reference lots. In practice, we often have extremely imbalanced numbers of reference and test lots available for the establishment of EAC. In this case, to assist the sponsors, the FDA proposed an idea for determining the number of reference lots and the number of test lots required in order not to have imbalanced sample sizes when establishing EAC for the equivalence test based on extensive simulation studies. Along this line, this article not only provides statistical justification of Dong, Tsong, and Weng's proposal, but also proposes an alternative method for sample size requirement for the Tier 1 equivalence test.Keywords: Analytical similarity assessment; equivalence acceptance criterion (EAC); equivalence test; stepwise approach; tiered approach; totality-of-the-evidence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27935446 DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2016.1265545
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biopharm Stat ISSN: 1054-3406 Impact factor: 1.051