| Literature DB >> 27934956 |
Chuanxi Fu1, Long Lu2, Hao Wu1, Jeffrey Shaman3, Yimin Cao1, Fang Fang4, Qiongying Yang1, Qing He1, Zhicong Yang1, Ming Wang1.
Abstract
Maternal antibodies transported across the placenta can provide vital immunity against infectious pathogens for infants. We here examine maternal antibody (MA) levels and their association with neonatal antibody levels. Pregnant women of gestational age ≥35 weeks were enrolled at a Guangzhou China hospital and mother-infant paired sera were collected. Measles IgG antibody was detected using ELISA assay, neutralizing antibodies titers against coxsackievirus A16 (CA16), enterovirus 71 (EV71), PV I-III and HIV-1 were performed. 711 mother-infant pairs were enrolled and positive relationships for paired serums were found (r: 0.683-0.918). 81.6%, 87.0%, and 82.3% of mothers, and 87.3%, 72.7%, and 72.2% of newborns were positive for measles, CA16 and EV71 antibodies respectively. The highest Neonatal: maternal ratio (NMR) was found in measles (1.042) and the ratios for the other pathogens ranged from 0.84 to 1.00. Linear regressions showed that log(NMR) decreased by a factor of 0.04-15.43 as log(MA) levels increased. A second analysis restricted to maternal positive measles sera revealed that MA measles of was still inversely associated with NMR. Low NMR was found in high MA HIV + serums among 22 paired sera. MA levels appear to play a role determining transplacental antibody transfer; further study is needed to reveal the mechanism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27934956 PMCID: PMC5146964 DOI: 10.1038/srep38874
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Seroprevalence of measles, coxsackievirus A16, enterovirus 71, and poliovirus I, II, III antibodies in maternal and newborn serum samples.
| Level | NO | Maternal serum | Neonatal serum | Neonatal Maternal Ratio†§ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMT (95%CI) | GMT (95%CI) | ||||
| Measles | Maternal<200 | 131 | 78.8 (53.6, 98.6) | 162.3 (113.6, 196.6) | 1.128 (1.103, 1.162) |
| ≥200 | 580 | 963.9 (832.1, 1104.0) | 1246.8 (1123.5, 1367.3) | 1.036 (1.031, 1.042) | |
| Overall | 711 | 674.0 (596.8, 762.0) | 960.3 (819.9, 1044.1) | 1.042 (1.039, 1.050) | |
| CA16 | Maternal<1:8 | 29 | 4.0∫ | 4.0∫ | 1.000 |
| ≥1:8 | 195 | 32.0 (24.0, 32.0) | 16.0 (16.0, 24.0) | 0.857 (0.800, 0.896) | |
| Overall | 224 | 24.0 (24.0, 32.0) | 16.0 (12.0, 16.0) | 0.904 (0.848, 1.000) | |
| EV71 | Maternal<1:8 | 39 | 4.0∫ | 4.0∫ | 1.000 |
| ≥1:8 | 185 | 32.0 (24.0, 32.0) | 24.0 (16.0, 32.0) | 0.948 (0.911, 1.000) | |
| Overall | 224 | 24.0 (16.0, 32.0) | 16.0 (12.0, 24.0) | 1.000 (1.000, 1.000) | |
| PVI | Maternal<1:8 | 29 | 2.0 (2.0, 6.0) | 2.0 (2.0, 6.0) | 1.000 (1.000, 1.000) |
| ≥1:8 | 190 | 32.0 (32.0, 48.0) | 32.0 (24.0, 48.0) | 1.000 (0.941, 1.000) | |
| Overall | 219 | 32.0 (24.0, 32.0) | 24.0 (24.0, 32.0) | 1.000 (1.000, 1.000) | |
| PVII | Maternal<1:8 | 32 | 2.0 (2.0, 4.0) | 2.0 (2.0, 2.0) | 1.000 (1.000, 1.000) |
| ≥1:8 | 186 | 32.0 (32.0, 48.0) | 24.0 (16.0, 32.0) | 0.911 (0.884, 1.000) | |
| Overall | 218 | 32.0 (24.0, 32.0) | 16.0 (12.0, 24.0) | 0.941 (0.896, 1.000) | |
| PVIII | Maternal<1:8 | 61 | 2.0 (2.0, 4.0) | 2.0 (2.0, 2.0) | 1.000 (1.000, 1.000) |
| ≥1:8 | 153 | 32.0 (24.0, 32.0) | 12.0 (8.0, 16.0) | 0.764 (0.716, 0.837) | |
| Overall | 214 | 16.0 (12.0, 24.0) | 6.0 (4.0, 8.0) | 0.837 (0.764, 0.911) |
NOTE: The medians with the 95%CIs for CA16, EV71, PVI, PVII, and PVIII antibodies were the geometric mean concentrations.
†NMR = log (neonatal level): log (maternal level).
∫For CA16 and EV71 antibodies, all titers of maternal sera were 1:4.
§Comparisons for NMRs between two groups: Measles (t = 3.204, p = 0.002), CA16 (t = 5.422, p < 0.001), EV71 (t = 4.142, p < 0.001), PVI (t = 2.314, p = 0.028), PVII (t = 1.611, p = 0.117), PVIII (t = 3.467, p = 0.001).
Linear models for NMRs as a function of maternal levels for different antibodies.
| Model 1# | Model 2* | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO. | Beta (95%CI) | NO. | ||||||
| Measles | 516 | −15.43 (−18.17, −12.69) | −11.05 | <0.001 | 421 | −0.06 (−0.07, −0.04) | −7.69 | <0.001 |
| CA16 | 208 | −0.10 (−0.16, −0.04) | −3.22 | 0.001 | 180 | −0.07 (−0.14, 0.02) | −1.61 | 0.109 |
| EV71 | 208 | −0.04 (−0.12, 0.03) | −1.21 | 0.226 | 171 | 0.06 (−0.02, 0.14) | 1.49 | 0.138 |
| PVI | 203 | −0.08 (−0.16, −0.01) | −2.11 | 0.037 | 175 | 0.03 (−0.06, 0.12) | 0.73 | 0.467 |
| PVII | 202 | −0.09 (−0.20, 0.01) | 0.12 | 0.087 | 172 | 0.06 (−0.03, 0.14) | 1.24 | 0.217 |
| PVIII | 198 | −0.24 (−0.39, −0.10) | −3.30 | 0.001 | 145 | 0.18 (0.05, 0.31) | 2.79 | 0.006 |
NOTE: The ENTER (forced Entry) method for all variables was used for the multiple linear regression models.
In both models, the dependent variable was NMR and the independent variables were maternal age, education, vaccination history (measles), hypertension, diabetes, anemia, gestation week, newborn’s gender, birth weight and Log (maternal level).
All maternal sera were analyzed in model 1 and only positive maternal sera were analyzed in model 2.
#In model 1, education (Beta = 0.071, p = 0.044) and birth weight (Beta = 0.123, p = 0.012) were also significant for NMR of CA16, gestation week (Beta = −2.971, p = 0.003) and maternal age (Beta = −0.014, p = 0.004) were significant for NMR of EV71, and hypertension was significant for PV II (Beta = 0.780, p = 0.005).
*In model 2, maternal age (Beta = −0.011, p = 0.022) for PV I and gestation week (Beta = −0.041, p = 0.031) for PVII were significant.
Figure 1Neonatal Maternal Ratio (NMR) with 95% CIs grouped for subjects with maternal antibody levels above and below the overall median.