Literature DB >> 27934879

Xp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma with NONO-TFE3 gene fusion: morphology, prognosis, and potential pitfall in detecting TFE3 gene rearrangement.

Qiu-Yuan Xia1, Zhe Wang2, Ni Chen3, Hua-Lei Gan4, Xiao-Dong Teng5, Shan-Shan Shi1, Xuan Wang1, Xue Wei1, Sheng-Bing Ye1, Rui Li1, Heng-Hui Ma1, Zhen-Feng Lu1, Xiao-Jun Zhou1, Qiu Rao1.   

Abstract

Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas are characterized by several different translocations involving the TFE3 gene. Tumors with different specific gene fusions may have different clinicopathological manifestations. Fewer than 10 renal cell carcinoma cases with NONO-TFE3 have been described. Here we examined eight additional cases of this rare tumor using clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analyses. The male-to-female ratio of our study cohort was 1:1, and the median age was 30 years. The most distinctive feature of the tumors was that they exhibited glandular/tubular or papillary architecture that was lined with small-to-medium cuboidal to high columnar cells with indistinct cell borders and an abundantly clear or flocculent eosinophilic cytoplasm. The nuclei were oriented toward the luminal surface and were round and uniform in shape, which resulted in the appearance of secretory endometrioid subnuclear vacuolization. The distinct glandular/tubular or papillary architecture was often accompanied by sheets of epithelial cells that presented a biphasic pattern. Immunohistochemically, all eight cases demonstrated moderate (2+) or strong (3+) positive staining for TFE3, CD10, RCC marker, and PAX-8. None of the tumors were immunoreactive for CK7, Cathepsin K, Melan-A, HMB45, Ksp-cadherin, Vimentin, CA9, 34βE12 or CD117. NONO-TFE3 fusion transcripts were identified in six cases by RT-PCR. All eight cases showed equivocal split signals with a distance of nearly 2 signal diameters and sometimes had false-negative results. Furthermore, we developed a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay to serve as an adjunct diagnostic tool for the detection of the NONO-TFE3 fusion gene and used this method to detect the fusion gene in all eight cases. Long-term follow-up (range, 10-102 months) was available for 7 patients. All 7 patients were alive with no evidence of recurrent disease or disease progression after their initial resection. This report adds to the known data regarding NONO-TFE3 renal cell carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27934879     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  16 in total

Review 1.  MiT family translocation renal cell carcinomas: A 15th anniversary update.

Authors:  Jatin S Gandhi; Faizan Malik; Mahul B Amin; Pedram Argani; Armita Bahrami
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Detection of 6 TFEB-amplified renal cell carcinomas and 25 renal cell carcinomas with MITF translocations: systematic morphologic analysis of 85 cases evaluated by clinical TFE3 and TFEB FISH assays.

Authors:  Stephanie L Skala; Hong Xiao; Aaron M Udager; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Sudhanshu Shukla; Yang Zhang; Carrie Landau; Lina Shao; Diane Roulston; Lisha Wang; Javed Siddiqui; Xuhong Cao; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Miao Zhang; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Steven C Smith; Jesse K McKenney; Bryan L Betz; Jeffrey L Myers; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Scott A Tomlins; Rohit Mehra
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  TFE3 and TFEB-rearranged renal cell carcinomas: an immunohistochemical panel to differentiate from common renal cell neoplasms.

Authors:  Anna Caliò; Stefano Marletta; Matteo Brunelli; Serena Pedron; Sofia Canete Portillo; Diego Segala; Elena Bariani; Stefano Gobbo; George Netto; Guido Martignoni
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.535

4.  The classification of pediatric and young adult renal cell carcinomas registered on the children's oncology group (COG) protocol AREN03B2 after focused genetic testing.

Authors:  Mariana M Cajaiba; Lisa M Dyer; James I Geller; Lawrence J Jennings; David George; Dawn Kirschmann; Stephen M Rohan; Nicholas G Cost; Geetika Khanna; Elizabeth A Mullen; Jeffrey S Dome; Conrad V Fernandez; Elizabeth J Perlman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Nuclear translocation of ASPL-TFE3 fusion protein creates favorable metabolism by mediating autophagy in translocation renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ru Fang; Xiaotong Wang; Qiuyuan Xia; Ming Zhao; Hao Zhang; Xuan Wang; Shengbing Ye; Kai Cheng; Yan Liang; Yang Cheng; Yayun Gu; Qiu Rao
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 6.  A review of neoplasms with MITF/MiT family translocations.

Authors:  Shuanzeng Wei; Joseph R Testa; Pedram Argani
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  NEAT1-TFE3 and KAT6A-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas, new members of MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jianming Pei; Harry Cooper; Douglas B Flieder; Jacqueline N Talarchek; Tahseen Al-Saleem; Robert G Uzzo; Essel Dulaimi; Arthur S Patchefsky; Joseph R Testa; Shuanzeng Wei
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 8.  NONO and tumorigenesis: More than splicing.

Authors:  Peifu Feng; Ling Li; Tanggang Deng; Yan Liu; Neng Ling; Siyuan Qiu; Lin Zhang; Bo Peng; Wei Xiong; Lanqin Cao; Lei Zhang; Mao Ye
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  Factors Associated with Survival From Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma Diagnosis-A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

Authors:  Yuqing Wu; Saisai Chen; Minhao Zhang; Kuangzheng Liu; Jibo Jing; Kehao Pan; Lihua Zhang; Bin Xu; Xiaoming Lu; Ming Chen
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 10.  Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Update on Clinicopathological and Molecular Features.

Authors:  Kentaro Inamura
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.