Literature DB >> 27933737

Testing the influence of surfactant-based wound dressings on proteinase activity.

Sunyoung Jeong1, Gregory S Schultz1, Daniel J Gibson1.   

Abstract

Proteinases are enzymes that can digest other proteins. In chronic wounds, a sub-class of these enzymes with the ability to degrade the extracellular matrix (matrix metalloproteinases, MMPs) have been found to both inhibit healing and to be able to aid in enzymatically debriding a wound. Enzymatic debridement using the enzymes present in a wound is generally called autolytic debridement. Clinicians seeking to employ autolytic debridement typically use occlusive materials such as medical honey, alginate dressings and other occlusive dressings. A relatively new class of gel dressings comprised of surfactants are now available for clinical use. A variety of surfactants are used in the study of MMP biochemistry. Surfactants can deactivate MMPs or can enhance their activity, depending on the surfactant. In order to begin to understand how the MMPs found in chronic wounds would respond to these new dressings, we tested a serial dilution series of two of the currently available surfactant-based dressings to determine their effects on four separate MMPs. The dose-response versus MMP activity of bacterial collagenase, host-derived MMP-8 and MMPs-2 and -9 was assessed using a simple mix-and-read fluorescent peptide activity assay. The enzyme's native activity in the absence of the gel was used to compare against the surfactant-treated samples. We found that the surfactant affected the proteinase activity differently for each enzyme. The activity of the bacterial collagenase was increased at low concentrations but slightly inhibited as the concentrations increased. The host MMP-8 collagenase responded similarly in that it was inhibited at higher concentrations. Interestingly, both MMP gelatinases presented with substantially increased activities, with MMP-2 increased to 200% of native activity, while MMP-9 presented with an increase of 300% activity over the same concentration range. MMPs appear to respond to a surfactant-based gel dressing differentially, with the MMP most commonly elevated in chronic wounds having the highest boost to activity. In wounds with elevated MMPs, our data suggest that the use of these surfactant-based dressings would be expected to enhance the activity of MMPs 2 and 9 gelatinases while simultaneously inhibiting MMP-8 collagenase. Hypothetically, this imbalanced effect would support a protection of the native dermal collagen and removal of denatured materials. However, the demonstration of these anticipated consequences is still being investigated.
© 2016 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autolytic debridement; MMPs; Proteinases; Surfactant gel dressing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27933737      PMCID: PMC7950041          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  17 in total

1.  Ratios of activated matrix metalloproteinase-9 to tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 in wound fluids are inversely correlated with healing of pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Glenn P Ladwig; Martin C Robson; Ran Liu; M Ann Kuhn; David F Muir; Gregory S Schultz
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Does honey have a role in paediatric wound management?

Authors:  Stefan Bittmann; Elisabeth Luchter; Michael Thiel; Genn Kameda; Ralph Hanano; Alfred Längler
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2010 Aug 12-Sep 8

3.  Analysis of the acute and chronic wound environments: the role of proteases and their inhibitors.

Authors:  N J Trengove; M C Stacey; S MacAuley; N Bennett; J Gibson; F Burslem; G Murphy; G Schultz
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  A surfactant-based wound dressing can reduce bacterial biofilms in a porcine skin explant model.

Authors:  Qingping Yang; Christelle Larose; Alessandra C Della Porta; Gregory S Schultz; Daniel J Gibson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-05-22       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Using active Leptospermum honey in the debridement process: 6 challenging cases from the inner city.

Authors:  Cecilia Gray; Fatima Ishii
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Search for a nontoxic surgical scrub solution for periorbital lacerations.

Authors:  C A Bryant; G T Rodeheaver; E M Reem; L S Nichter; J G Kenney; R F Edlich
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Effect of scrubbing and irrigation on staphylococcal and streptococcal counts in contaminated lacerations.

Authors:  J M Howell; H S Dhindsa; T O Stair; B A Edwards
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  A new stable pluronic F68 gel carrier for antibiotics in contaminated wound treatment.

Authors:  D M Faulkner; S T Sutton; J D Hesford; B C Faulkner; D A Major; T B Hellewell; M M Laughon; G T Rodeheaver; R F Edlich
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.469

9.  Pluronic F-68: a promising new skin wound cleanser.

Authors:  G T Rodeheaver; L Kurtz; B J Kircher; R F Edlich
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  Effects of detergents on catalytic activity of human endometase/matrilysin 2, a putative cancer biomarker.

Authors:  Hyun I Park; Seakwoo Lee; Asad Ullah; Qiang Cao; Qing-Xiang Amy Sang
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 3.365

View more
  2 in total

1.  Surfactants: Role in biofilm management and cellular behaviour.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Dieter Mayer; Robert S Kirsner; Greg Schultz; Dot Weir; Sashwati Roy; Afsaneh Alavi; Marco Romanelli
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Mode of action of poloxamer-based surfactants in wound care and efficacy on biofilms.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; Rui Chen; Dieter Mayer; Anne-Marie Salisbury
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.