Literature DB >> 27933443

Editorial: CORR ® Will Change to Double-blind Peer Review-What Took Us So Long to Get There?

Seth S Leopold1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27933443      PMCID: PMC5213965          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5198-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  F Godlee; C R Gale; C N Martyn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial.

Authors:  S van Rooyen; F Godlee; S Evans; R Smith; N Black
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.

Authors:  A C Justice; M K Cho; M A Winker; J A Berlin; D Rennie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige.

Authors:  Kanu Okike; Kevin T Hug; Mininder S Kocher; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review.

Authors:  M Fisher; S B Friedman; B Strauss
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Despite Growing Number of Women Surgeons, Authorship Gender Disparity in Orthopaedic Literature Persists Over 30 Years.

Authors:  Meghan A Brown; Mary Kate Erdman; Alana M Munger; Anna N Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.755

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.