Literature DB >> 27933373

Outcomes of multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib, lenalidomide, and carfilzomib.

Ariana Berenson1, Suzie Vardanyan1, Michael David1, James Wang1,2, Nika Manik Harutyunyan1, Jillian Gottlieb1, Ran Halleluyan1, Tanya M Spektor3, Kyle A Udd1,2, Shahrooz Eshaghian1, Youram Nassir2, Benjamin Eades2, Regina Swift2, James R Berenson4,5,6.   

Abstract

New classes of drugs including the proteasome inhibitors (PI) bortezomib and, more recently, carfilzomib and the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide have shown improved outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM) patients during the past decade. However, most of the studies reporting outcomes for patients receiving these drugs have relied on older data sets derived from large institutions that included patients not receiving their treatment at those facilities and represented only those eligible for clinical trials or were from sites where treatment options were limited. We have analyzed data from 258 MM patients who have received treatment with at least one of three agents: bortezomib, carfilzomib, and lenalidomide in a single clinic specializing in MM with respect to their responses and other outcomes to treatment regimens including these agents. Response rates were similar between these three drugs when used for the first time and again during subsequent treatment regimens. As expected, the clinical benefit rates (CBRs) were better for patients receiving their first treatment when compared to their use in subsequent treatment regimens. The CBRs were similar during their 2nd, 3rd, and 4th treatments containing these agents. Many patients refractory to these agents showed responses to regimens containing these same drugs when used in different combinations. In addition, patients refractory to one PI often responded to the other PI. The results of this study demonstrate that novel agents can be used repeatedly in novel combinations with significant clinical benefit for patients with MM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bortezomib, lenalidomide; Carfilzomib; Multiple myeloma; Overall survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27933373     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-016-2889-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  6 in total

Review 1.  Equal Treatment and Outcomes for Everyone with Multiple Myeloma: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Sikander Ailawadhi; Kirtipal Bhatia; Sonikpreet Aulakh; Zahara Meghji; Asher Chanan-Khan
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  CXCR4 and anti-BCMA CAR co-modified natural killer cells suppress multiple myeloma progression in a xenograft mouse model.

Authors:  Yu Yang Ng; Zhicheng Du; Xi Zhang; Wee Joo Chng; Shu Wang
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 5.987

3.  A compound chimeric antigen receptor strategy for targeting multiple myeloma.

Authors:  K H Chen; M Wada; K G Pinz; H Liu; X Shuai; X Chen; L E Yan; J C Petrov; H Salman; L Senzel; E L H Leung; X Jiang; Y Ma
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 4.  Recent updates on CAR T clinical trials for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Quande Lin; Juanjuan Zhao; Yongping Song; Delong Liu
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 27.401

5.  Clarifying the molecular mechanism associated with carfilzomib resistance in human multiple myeloma using microarray gene expression profile and genetic interaction network.

Authors:  Zhihong Zheng; Tingbo Liu; Jing Zheng; Jianda Hu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Proteasome inhibitors against amelanotic melanoma.

Authors:  Justyna Sidor-Kaczmarek; Mirosława Cichorek; Jan Henryk Spodnik; Sławomir Wójcik; Janusz Moryś
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 6.691

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.