Literature DB >> 27932546

What can a participatory approach to evaluation contribute to the field of integrated care?

Laura Eyre1, Michael Farrelly2, Martin Marshall1.   

Abstract

Better integration of care within the health sector and between health and social care is seen in many countries as an essential way of addressing the enduring problems of dwindling resources, changing demographics and unacceptable variation in quality of care. Current research evidence about the effectiveness of integration efforts supports neither the enthusiasm of those promoting and designing integrated care programmes nor the growing efforts of practitioners attempting to integrate care on the ground. In this paper we present a methodological approach, based on the principles of participatory research, that attempts to address this challenge. Participatory approaches are characterised by a desire to use social science methods to solve practical problems and a commitment on the part of researchers to substantive and sustained collaboration with relevant stakeholders. We describe how we applied an emerging practical model of participatory research, the researcher-in-residence model, to evaluate a large-scale integrated care programme in the UK. We propose that the approach added value to the programme in a number of ways: by engaging stakeholders in using established evidence and with the benefits of rigorously evaluating their work, by providing insights for local stakeholders that they were either not familiar with or had not fully considered in relation to the development and implementation of the programme and by challenging established mindsets and norms. While there is still much to learn about the benefits and challenges of applying participatory approaches in the health sector, we demonstrate how using such approaches have the potential to help practitioners integrate care more effectively in their daily practice and help progress the academic study of integrated care. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Keywords:  Evaluation methodology; Health services research; Qualitative research; Quality improvement methodologies

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27932546     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  12 in total

1.  Can Collaborative Care Cure the Mediocrity of Usual Care for Common Mental Disorders?

Authors:  Nadiya Sunderji; Paul A Kurdyak; Sanjeev Sockalingam; Benoit H Mulsant
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.356

2.  GP leadership in clinical commissioning groups: a qualitative multi-case study approach across England.

Authors:  Martin Marshall; Richard Holti; Jean Hartley; Tatum Matharu; John Storey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Evaluating the effectiveness of care coordination interventions designed and implemented through a participatory action research process: Lessons learned from a quasi-experimental study in public healthcare networks in Latin America.

Authors:  María-Luisa Vázquez; Andrea Miranda-Mendizabal; Pamela Eguiguren; Amparo-Susana Mogollón-Pérez; Marina Ferreira-de-Medeiros-Mendes; Julieta López-Vázquez; Fernando Bertolotto; Ingrid Vargas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How to specify healthcare process improvements collaboratively using rapid, remote consensus-building: a framework and a case study of its application.

Authors:  Jan W van der Scheer; Matthew Woodward; Akbar Ansari; Tim Draycott; Cathy Winter; Graham Martin; Karolina Kuberska; Natalie Richards; Ruth Kern; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation.

Authors:  Mirza Lalani; Kate Hall; Mirek Skrypak; Chris Laing; John Welch; Peter Toohey; Sarah Seaholme; Thomas Weijburg; Laura Eyre; Martin Marshall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Universities and primary care organisations working together to recruit GPs: a qualitative evaluation of the Enfield clinical teaching fellow programme.

Authors:  Melvyn M Jones; Nadia Bashir; Neetha Purushotham; Rachel Friel; Joe Rosenthal
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2018-04-24

7.  Unknown makes unloved-A case study on improving integrated health and social care in the Netherlands using a participatory approach.

Authors:  Manon Lette; Marijke Boorsma; Lidwien Lemmens; Annerieke Stoop; Giel Nijpels; Caroline Baan; Simone de Bruin
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2019-11-27

8.  Regional planning for meaningful person-centred care in mental health: context is the signal not the noise.

Authors:  D Rock; S P Cross
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 6.892

9.  Adapting rapid assessment procedures for implementation research using a team-based approach to analysis: a case example of patient quality and safety interventions in the ICU.

Authors:  Laura M Holdsworth; Nadia Safaeinili; Marcy Winget; Karl A Lorenz; Mary Lough; Steve Asch; Elizabeth Malcolm
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Can care coordination across levels be improved through the implementation of participatory action research interventions? Outcomes and conditions for sustaining changes in five Latin American countries.

Authors:  Ingrid Vargas; Pamela Eguiguren; Amparo-Susana Mogollón-Pérez; Isabella Samico; Fernando Bertolotto; Julieta López-Vázquez; María-Luisa Vázquez
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.