Literature DB >> 27932374

Discontinuation of dasatinib or nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: interim analysis of the STOP 2G-TKI study.

Delphine Rea1, Franck E Nicolini2, Michel Tulliez3, François Guilhot4, Joelle Guilhot4, Agnès Guerci-Bresler5, Martine Gardembas6, Valérie Coiteux7, Gaelle Guillerm8, Laurence Legros9, Gabriel Etienne10, Jean-Michel Pignon11, Bruno Villemagne12, Martine Escoffre-Barbe13, Jean-Christophe Ianotto8, Aude Charbonnier14, Hyacinthe Johnson-Ansah15, Marie-Pierre Noel7, Philippe Rousselot16, François-Xavier Mahon10.   

Abstract

STOP second generation (2G)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is a multicenter observational study designed to evaluate 2G-TKI discontinuation in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients receiving first-line or subsequent dasatinib or nilotinib who stopped therapy after at least 3 years of TKI treatment and in molecular response 4.5 (MR4.5) with undetectable BCR-ABL1 transcripts for the 2 preceding years at least were eligible for inclusion. This interim analysis reports outcomes of 60 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (median 47, range: 12-65). Twenty-six patients (43.3%) experienced a molecular relapse defined as the loss of a major molecular response (MMR). Relapses occurred after a median time of 4 months (range: 1-38). Cumulative incidences of molecular relapse by 12 and 48 months were 35% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.79% to 49.41%) and 44.76% (95% CI, 33.35% to 59.91%), respectively. Treatment-free remission (TFR) rates at 12 and 48 months were 63.33% (95% CI, 51.14% to 75.53%) and 53.57% (95% CI, 40.49% to 66.65%), respectively. In univariate analysis, prior suboptimal response or TKI resistance was the only baseline factor associated with significantly worse outcome. A landmark analysis demonstrated that loss of MR4.5 3 months after stopping TKI was predictive of failure to maintain MMR later on. During the treatment-free phase, no progression toward advanced phase CML occurred, and all relapsing patients regained MMR and MR4.5 after restarting therapy. In conclusion, discontinuation of first-line or subsequent 2G-TKI yields promising TFR rates without safety concerns. Further research is encouraged to better define conditions that will offer patients the highest chance to remain free from 2G-TKI therapy.
© 2017 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27932374     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-742205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  91 in total

Review 1.  Molecular monitoring in CML: how deep? How often? How should it influence therapy?

Authors:  Naranie Shanmuganathan; Timothy P Hughes
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

2.  Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells require cell-autonomous pleiotrophin signaling.

Authors:  Heather A Himburg; Martina Roos; Tiancheng Fang; Yurun Zhang; Christina M Termini; Lauren Schlussel; Mindy Kim; Amara Pang; Jenny Kan; Liman Zhao; Hyung Suh; Joshua P Sasine; Gopal Sapparapu; Peter M Bowers; Gary Schiller; John P Chute
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 3.  The argument for using imatinib in CML.

Authors:  Simone Claudiani; Jane F Apperley
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

4.  Targeted therapies: Remembrance of things past - discontinuation of second-generation TKI therapy for CML.

Authors:  Timothy P Hughes; David M Ross
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Early Management of CML.

Authors:  Naranie Shanmuganathan; Timothy P Hughes
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for CML with incorporation of treatment discontinuation.

Authors:  Chihiro Yamamoto; Hirotomo Nakashima; Takashi Ikeda; Shin-Ichiro Kawaguchi; Yumiko Toda; Shoko Ito; Kiyomi Mashima; Takashi Nagayama; Kento Umino; Daisuke Minakata; Hirofumi Nakano; Kaoru Morita; Ryoko Yamasaki; Miyuki Sugimoto; Yuko Ishihara; Masahiro Ashizawa; Kaoru Hatano; Kazuya Sato; Iekuni Oh; Shin-Ichiro Fujiwara; Masuzu Ueda; Ken Ohmine; Kazuo Muroi; Yoshinobu Kanda
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-11-12

Review 7.  Re-defining Prognosis of Hematological Malignancies by Dynamic Response Assessment Methods: Lessons Learnt in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Hodgkin Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Arihant Jain; Ankur Jain; Pankaj Malhotra
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 0.900

8.  Effect of study-level factors on treatment-free remission rate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jinchul Kim; Jisun Park; Yeonsook Moon; Suk Jin Choi; Joo Han Lim; Moon Hee Lee; Jinhyun Cho
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 9.  Minimal Residual Disease Eradication in CML: Does It Really Matter?

Authors:  Srinivas K Tantravahi; Raga S Guthula; Thomas O'Hare; Michael W Deininger
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 10.  Targeting minimal residual disease: a path to cure?

Authors:  Marlise R Luskin; Mark A Murakami; Scott R Manalis; David M Weinstock
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 60.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.