Literature DB >> 27932270

Prognostic value of lymph node yield during nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Andrew G Winer1, Emily A Vertosick2, Mazyar Ghanaat3, Renato B Corradi3, Sigrid Carlsson4, Daniel D Sjoberg2, Alexander I Sankin5, John P Sfakianos6, Eugene K Cha3, Guido Dalbagni3, Jonathan A Coleman7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Lymph node dissection (LND) performed during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains controversial and difficult to evaluate. The aim of this study was to investigate whether removal of more lymph nodes during RNU is safe and improves oncologic outcomes.
METHODS: We evaluated 422 patients who underwent RNU with concomitant LND for upper tract urothelial carcinoma between 1976 and 2015, assessing for an association between total nodes removed, recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific survival using Cox proportional hazards models. We also investigated the relationship between nodal yield and perioperative metrics and intersurgeon variability using linear regression.
RESULTS: In our cohort of 442 patients, 239 developed recurrences and 94 patients died of disease. Median follow-up among survivors was 3.7 years (interquartile range: 1.2, 7.4). The median nodal yield was 9 (interquartile range: 4, 16). Among patients with node-positive disease (pN1), we observed a significant improvement in recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.84 per 5 nodes removed, P = 0.039) and a nonsignificant improvement in cancer-specific survival with an increase in the nodal yield (hazard ratio = 0.90 per 5 nodes removed, P = 0.2). There was no evidence of an association between node yield and operative time, estimated blood loss, or 30-day complications on multivariable analysis. There was significant heterogeneity among surgeons regarding the extent of LND (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that a more extensive node dissection may improve oncologic outcomes in a subset of high-risk patients without significantly increasing operative time or serious complications. Additionally, we identified considerable intersurgeon heterogeneity regarding the extent of LND furthering the notion of surgeon variability as a nonstandardized factor.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Extent of lymph node dissection; Oncologic outcomes; UTUC; Upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27932270      PMCID: PMC5502780          DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  19 in total

Review 1.  Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: surgical approach and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Richard Zigeuner; Karl Pummer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  No overt influence of lymphadenectomy on cancer-specific survival in organ-confined versus locally advanced upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing radical nephroureterectomy: a retrospective international, multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Maximilian Burger; Shahrokh F Shariat; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Juan Ignacio Martinez-Salamanca; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Thomas F Chromecki; Vincenzo Ficarra; Wassim Kassouf; Christian Seitz; Armin Pycha; Stefan Tritschler; Thomas J Walton; Giacomo Novara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Prognostic factors in urothelial renal pelvis and ureter tumours: a multicentre Rare Cancer Network study.

Authors:  M Ozsahin; A Zouhair; S Villà; G Storme; B Chauvet; D Taussky; D Gouders; G Ries; P Bontemps; P A Coucke; R O Mirimanoff
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Evaluation of regional lymph node dissection in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Fernando P Secin; Theresa M Koppie; Juan I Martinez Salamanca; Shahid Bokhari; Ganesh V Raj; Semra Olgac; Angel Serio; Andrew Vickers; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Template-based lymphadenectomy in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: impact on patient survival.

Authors:  Tsunenori Kondo; Yasunobu Hashimoto; Hirohito Kobayashi; Junpei Iizuka; Hayakazu Nakazawa; Fumio Ito; Kazunari Tanabe
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 3.369

6.  European guidelines on upper tract urothelial carcinomas: 2013 update.

Authors:  Morgan Rouprêt; Marko Babjuk; Eva Compérat; Richard Zigeuner; Richard Sylvester; Max Burger; Nigel Cowan; Andreas Böhle; Bas W G Van Rhijn; Eero Kaasinen; Joan Palou; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Role of lymphadenectomy in the management of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  Tsunenori Kondo; Kazunari Tanabe
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.369

8.  Prognostic value of lymph node dissection in patients with muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  Marco Roscigno; Cesare Cozzarini; Roberto Bertini; Vincenzo Scattoni; Massimo Freschi; Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Gallina; Umberto Capitanio; Renzo Colombo; Guazzoni Giorgio; Francesco Montorsi; Patrizio Rigatti
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  A critical appraisal of the value of lymph node dissection at nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Claudio Jeldres; Hendrik Isbarn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Daniel Pharand; Hugues Widmer; Philippe Arjane; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Impact of the extent of regional lymphadenectomy on the survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  Tsunenori Kondo; Hayakazu Nakazawa; Fumio Ito; Yasunobu Hashimoto; Hiroshi Toma; Kazunari Tanabe
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

1.  Lymph node dissection could bring survival benefits to patients diagnosed with clinically node-negative upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a population-based, propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Fan Dong; Tianyuan Xu; Xianjin Wang; Yifan Shen; Xiaohua Zhang; Shanwen Chen; Shan Zhong; Minguang Zhang; Qiang Ding
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Role of lymph node dissection during radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: multi-institutional large retrospective study JCOG1110A.

Authors:  Junichi Inokuchi; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Mikio Sugimoto; Toshiki Tanigawa; Hiroyuki Fujimoto; Momokazu Gotoh; Naoya Masumori; Osamu Ogawa; Masatoshi Eto; Chikara Ohyama; Akito Yamaguchi; Hideyasu Matsuyama; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Tomohiko Asano; Junki Mizusawa; Junko Eba; Seiji Naito
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  The role of lymphadenectomy at the time of radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael E Goltzman; Augustyna Gogoj; Benjamin T Ristau
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-08

Review 4.  Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephro-Ureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Review.

Authors:  Arthur Peyrottes; Gianluigi Califano; Idir Ouzaïd; Paul Lainé-Caroff; Thibaut Long Depaquit; Jean-François Hermieu; Evanguelos Xylinas
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-24

5.  Effect of lymph node dissection on stage-specific survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Ting-Shuai Zhai; Liang Jin; Zhen Zhou; Xiang Liu; Huan Liu; Wei Chen; Jing-Yi Lu; Xu-Dong Yao; Li-Ming Feng; Lin Ye
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.