Literature DB >> 27932269

The presence of carcinoma in situ at radical cystectomy increases the risk of urothelial recurrence: Implications for follow-up schemes.

Marco Moschini1, Shahrokh F Shariat2, Mohammad Abufaraj2, Francesco Soria2, Tobias Klatte2, Giovanni La Croce3, Agostino Mattei4, Rocco Damiano5, Andrea Salonia3, Francesco Montorsi3, Alberto Briganti3, Renzo Colombo3, Andrea Gallina3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the incidence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) in patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) due to bladder cancer and to assess its effect on recurrence and survival rates.
METHODS: The study focused on 1,128 consecutive nonmetastatic patients with bladder cancer treated with RC at a single tertiary care referral center from 1994 to 2014. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare recurrence, cancer-specific mortality (CSM), and overall mortality-free rates in the overall population and in pT0-pT2 and pT3-pT4 patients after stratifying according to the presence of CIS. Multivariable (MVA) Cox regression analyses tested the effect of the presence of CIS on survival outcomes. MVA competing risk analyses were performed to assess the effect of CIS on urothelial recurrence.
RESULTS: The presence of CIS was reported in 277 (24.6%) patients. During a median follow-up of 6 years, 355 recurrences, 377 CSM, and 468 overall mortality were reported. At MVA Cox regression analyses, the presence of concomitant CIS was not associated with any survival effect when the overall population was considered (all P≥0.3). At MVA Cox regression analyses, there was no effect of CIS on survival outcomes in pT3-pT4 patients (all P>0.2); on the contrary, the presence of CIS was associated with worse CSM in pT0-pT2 patients only (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.82; CI: 1.01-3.29; P = 0.04). At MVA competing risk analyses predicting urothelial recurrence only, the presence of CIS was associated to an increased risk of urothelial recurrence in pT0-pT2 patients (HR = 2.99; CI: 1.05-8.53; P = 0.04), pT3-pT4 patients (HR = 10.29; CI: 1.40-75.75; P = 0.02), and in the overall population (HR = 4.47; CI: 1.81-11.07; P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: An increased risk of developing urothelial recurrence only was recorded in patients diagnosed with CIS at RC. Physicians should consider this aspect ensuring a more severe follow-up schemes in patients who harbored this pathological feature.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Cancer-specific survival; Carcinoma in situ; Radical cystectomy; Recurrence; pTis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27932269     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  4 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni; Peter C Black; Srikala S Sridhar; Anil Kapoor; Alexandre R Zlotta; Bobby Shayegan; Ricardo A Rendon; Peter Chung; Theodorus van der Kwast; Nimira Alimohamed; Yves Fradet; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Concomitant carcinoma in situ may not be a prognostic factor for patients with bladder cancer following radical cystectomy: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lijin Zhang; Bin Wu; Zhenlei Zha; Hu Zhao; Jun Yuan; Yuefang Jiang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Patterns and predictors of recurrence after open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrea Mari; Riccardo Campi; Riccardo Tellini; Giorgio Gandaglia; Simone Albisinni; Mohammad Abufaraj; Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Francesco Montorsi; Roland van Velthoven; Marco Carini; Andrea Minervini; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  The effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer (Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System): A systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Carando; Luca Afferi; Giancarlo Marra; Wojciech Krajewski; Vincenzo Pagliarulo; Mohammad Abufaraj; Evanguelos Xylinas; Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Marco Moschini
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2020-03-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.