Literature DB >> 27931075

Assessing quantile prediction with censored quantile regression models.

Ruosha Li1, Limin Peng2.   

Abstract

An important goal of censored quantile regression is to provide reliable predictions of survival quantiles, which are often reported in practice to offer robust and comprehensive biomedical summaries. However, formal methods for evaluating and comparing working quantile regression models in terms of their performance in predicting survival quantiles have been lacking, especially when the working models are subject to model mis-specification. In this article, we proposes a sensible and rigorous framework to fill in this gap. We introduce and justify a predictive performance measure defined based on the check loss function. We derive estimators of the proposed predictive performance measure and study their distributional properties and the corresponding inference procedures. More importantly, we develop model comparison procedures that enable thorough evaluations of model predictive performance among nested or non-nested models. Our proposals properly accommodate random censoring to the survival outcome and the realistic complication of model mis-specification, and thus are generally applicable. Extensive simulations and a real data example demonstrate satisfactory performances of the proposed methods in real life settings.
© 2016, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Censored quantile regression; Model comparisons; Model mis-specification; Perturbation resampling; Predictive performance; Survival quantiles

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27931075      PMCID: PMC5462897          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  8 in total

1.  Causal inference on the difference of the restricted mean lifetime between two groups.

Authors:  P Y Chen; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Predicting the restricted mean event time with the subject's baseline covariates in survival analysis.

Authors:  Lu Tian; Lihui Zhao; L J Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Estimation of prediction error for survival models.

Authors:  Jerald F Lawless; Yan Yuan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  QUANTILE CALCULUS AND CENSORED REGRESSION.

Authors:  Yijian Huang
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 4.028

5.  Shrinkage Estimation of Varying Covariate Effects Based On Quantile Regression.

Authors:  Limin Peng; Jinfeng Xu; Nancy Kutner
Journal:  Stat Comput       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.559

6.  Misuse of DeLong test to compare AUCs for nested models.

Authors:  Olga V Demler; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Association of fish intake and survival in a cohort of incident dialysis patients.

Authors:  Nancy G Kutner; Patricia Ward Clow; Rebecca Zhang; Xavier Aviles
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Q-LEARNING WITH CENSORED DATA.

Authors:  Yair Goldberg; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.028

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.