Literature DB >> 27930094

Cancer Stem Cell Hypothesis for Therapeutic Innovation in Clinical Oncology? Taking the Root Out, Not Chopping the Leaf.

Kevin Dzobo1,2, Dimakatso Alice Senthebane1,2, Arielle Rowe1,2, Nicholas Ekow Thomford3, Lamech M Mwapagha1,2, Nasir Al-Awwad4, Collet Dandara3, M Iqbal Parker1,2.   

Abstract

Clinical oncology is in need of therapeutic innovation. New hypotheses and concepts for translation of basic research to novel diagnostics and therapeutics are called for. In this context, the cancer stem cell (CSC) hypothesis rests on the premise that tumors comprise tumor cells and a subset of tumor-initiating cells, CSCs, in a quiescent state characterized by slow cell cycling and expression of specific stem cell surface markers with the capability to maintain a tumor in vivo. The CSCs have unlimited self-renewal abilities and propagate tumors through division into asymmetric daughter cells. This differentiation is induced by both genetic and environmental factors. Another characteristic of CSCs is their therapeutic resistance, which is due to their quiescent state and slow dividing. Notably, the CSC phenotype differs greatly between patients and different cancer types. The CSCs may differ genetically and phenotypically and may include primary CSCs and metastatic stem cells circulating within the blood system. Targeting CSCs will require the knowledge of distinct stem cells within the tumor. CSCs can differentiate into nontumorigenic cells and this has been touted as the source of heterogeneity observed in many solid tumors. The latter cannot be fully explained by epigenetic regulation or by the clonal evolution theory. This heterogeneity markedly influences how tumors respond to therapy and prognosis. The present expert review offers an analysis and synthesis of the latest research and concepts on CSCs, with a view to truly disruptive innovation for future diagnostics and therapeutics in clinical oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; cancer stem cells; disruptive innovation; heterogeneity; innovation systems; stem cell markers; therapeutics; tumour initiating cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27930094     DOI: 10.1089/omi.2016.0152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  OMICS        ISSN: 1536-2310


  17 in total

1.  HLJ1 (DNAJB4) Gene Is a Novel Biomarker Candidate in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tolga Acun; Natalie Doberstein; Jens K Habermann; Timo Gemoll; Christoph Thorns; Emin Oztas; Thomas Ried
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2017-05

2.  Does GD2 synthase (GD2S) detect cancer stem cells in blood samples of breast carcinomas?

Authors:  Maryam Mansoori; Isa Abdi Rad; Alireza Mirzaei; Kevin J Tam; Seyed Mohsen Hosseini; Rahim Mahmodlu; Fatemeh Mansouri; Leili Saeednejad Zanjani; Zahra Madjd
Journal:  J Appl Biomed       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 1.797

Review 3.  Ovarian cancer stem cells: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Carlotta Sabini; Flavia Sorbi; Paula Cunnea; Christina Fotopoulou
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-21       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Elevated Asparagine Biosynthesis Drives Brain Tumor Stem Cell Metabolic Plasticity and Resistance to Oxidative Stress.

Authors:  Tom M Thomas; Ken Miyaguchi; Lincoln A Edwards; Hongqiang Wang; Hassen Wollebo; Li Aiguo; Ramachandran Murali; Yizhou Wang; Daniel Braas; Justin S Michael; Allen M Andres; Miqin Zhang; Kamel Khalili; Roberta A Gottlieb; J Manuel Perez; John S Yu
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 5.  The Role of Tumor Microenvironment in Chemoresistance: To Survive, Keep Your Enemies Closer.

Authors:  Dimakatso Alice Senthebane; Arielle Rowe; Nicholas Ekow Thomford; Hendrina Shipanga; Daniella Munro; Mohammad A M Al Mazeedi; Hashim A M Almazyadi; Karlien Kallmeyer; Collet Dandara; Michael S Pepper; M Iqbal Parker; Kevin Dzobo
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Ovarian cancer stem cells: still an elusive entity?

Authors:  Michela Lupia; Ugo Cavallaro
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 27.401

7.  Chemoresistance to Cancer Treatment: Benzo-α-Pyrene as Friend or Foe?

Authors:  Kevin Dzobo; Naseeha Hassen; Dimakatso Alice Senthebane; Nicholas Ekow Thomford; Arielle Rowe; Hendrina Shipanga; Ambroise Wonkam; M Iqbal Parker; Shaheen Mowla; Collet Dandara
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  Advances in Therapeutic Targeting of Cancer Stem Cells within the Tumor Microenvironment: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Kevin Dzobo; Dimakatso Alice Senthebane; Chelene Ganz; Nicholas Ekow Thomford; Ambroise Wonkam; Collet Dandara
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 9.  Dynamism, Sensitivity, and Consequences of Mesenchymal and Stem-Like Phenotype of Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Petra Gener; Joaquin Seras-Franzoso; Patricia González Callejo; Fernanda Andrade; Diana Rafael; Francesc Martínez; Sara Montero; Diego Arango; Joan Sayós; Ibane Abasolo; Simó Schwartz
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 5.443

10.  Autonomous TGFβ signaling induces phenotypic variation in human acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Shingai; Takafumi Yokota; Daisuke Okuzaki; Takao Sudo; Tomohiko Ishibashi; Yukiko Doi; Tomoaki Ueda; Takayuki Ozawa; Ritsuko Nakai; Akira Tanimura; Michiko Ichii; Hirohiko Shibayama; Yuzuru Kanakura; Naoki Hosen
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 6.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.