Literature DB >> 27930090

Sonoelastography of the Common Flexor Tendon of the Elbow with Histologic Agreement: A Cadaveric Study.

Andrea S Klauser1, Mathias J Pamminger1, Ethan J Halpern1, Mohamed M H Abd Ellah1, Bernhard Moriggl1, Mihra S Taljanovic1, Christian Deml1, Judith Sztankay1, Guenter Klima1, Leonhard Gruber1, Werner R Jaschke1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine the correlation of the results of conventional B-mode ultrasonography (US) and compression sonoelastography with histologic results in common flexor tendons of the elbow in human cadavers. Materials and Methods Twenty-five common flexor tendons were evaluated in 16 fresh, unembalmed cadavers of 11 women with a median age of 85 years (range, 71-101 years) and five men with a median age of 78 years (range, 70-88 years). Informed consent was provided according to the last will of the donors. B-mode US results were classified as grade 1, normal tendon with homogeneous fibrillar pattern; grade 2, tendon thickening or hypoechoic areas and/or calcifications in less than 30% of the tendon; or grade 3, hypoechoic areas and/or calcifications greater than 30% of the tendon. Sonoelastographic results were grade 1, blue (hardest) to green (hard); grade 2, yellow (soft); and grade 3, red (softest). The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to determine agreement with histologic findings for each B-mode US, sonoelastographic, and combined B-mode US and sonoelastographic examination. Histologic results were grade 1, normal, with parallel fibrillar pattern; grade 2, mild tendinopathy, with cellular infiltration, angiogenesis, or fatty vacuoles; or grade 3, severe tendinopathy, with loss of parallel collagen structure and necrosis. Results Histologic alterations were detected in 44% (11 of 25) of biopsy specimens. Intraclass correlation with histologic results was 0.57 for B-mode US, 0.68 for sonoelastography, and 0.84 for the combination of the two approaches. Conclusion The addition of sonoelastography to B-mode US provided statistically significant improvement in correlation with histologic results compared with the use of B-mode US alone (P < .02). © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27930090     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

1.  The Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) 2016 in Zurich, Switzerland: summary.

Authors:  Marco Zanetti
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound updated in 2017 by European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus.

Authors:  Luca Maria Sconfienza; Domenico Albano; Georgina Allen; Alberto Bazzocchi; Bianca Bignotti; Vito Chianca; Fernando Facal de Castro; Elena E Drakonaki; Elena Gallardo; Jan Gielen; Andrea Sabine Klauser; Carlo Martinoli; Giovanni Mauri; Eugene McNally; Carmelo Messina; Rebeca Mirón Mombiela; Davide Orlandi; Athena Plagou; Magdalena Posadzy; Rosa de la Puente; Monique Reijnierse; Federica Rossi; Saulius Rutkauskas; Ziga Snoj; Jelena Vucetic; David Wilson; Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Ultrasound elastography in tendon pathology: state of the art.

Authors:  Romain Domenichini; Jean-Baptiste Pialat; Andrea Podda; Sébastien Aubry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Ultrasound elastography: compression elastography and shear-wave elastography in the assessment of tendon injury.

Authors:  Rui Prado-Costa; João Rebelo; João Monteiro-Barroso; Ana Sofia Preto
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-08-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.