Christian Jung1, Georg Fuernau2,3, Ingo Eitel2,3, Steffen Desch2,3, Gerhard Schuler4, Malte Kelm5, Volker Adams4, Holger Thiele2,3. 1. Medical Faculty, Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. christian.jung@med.uni-duesseldorf.de. 2. Medical Clinic II, Cardiology/Angiology/Intensive Care Medicine, University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. 3. German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. 4. Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, University of Leipzig-Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany. 5. Medical Faculty, Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the improvement of therapeutic options for patients in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a complication with high mortality rates. Organ failure centrally determines the prognosis of these high-risk patients. Aim of the current study was to assess the incidence of hypoxic hepatitis (HH) in CS, its laboratory detection evaluating novel and established biomarkers and to estimate the prognostic relevance of HH in current clinical practice. METHODS: In 172 patients with CS complicating AMI, blood samples were collected at admission and after 1 day as prespecified subanalysis of the intra-aortic balloon pumping IABP-SHOCK II trial. Classic parameters of HH were measured in addition to argininosuccinate synthase 1 and sulfotransferase isoform SULT2A1 was determined as new biomarker using standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. All-cause mortality at 30 days was used for outcome assessment. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 40%. The incidence of HH with an increase of aminotransferase levels to be 20 times above the upper normal level was 18%. Patients with HH had a distinctly higher 30-day mortality rate compared to patients without HH (68 vs. 34%; p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment aspartate-aminotransferase (ASAT) remained an independent predictor of 30-day mortality together with serum lactate and serum creatinine, while the new biomarkers failed to predict outcome. Comparing different liver markers using receiver operating characteristic analysis, ASAT showed the highest area under the curve for the prediction of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: HH occurs frequently in CS and is associated with particular poor outcome. As conventional biomarker, ASAT is the strongest laboratory predictor of outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00491036.
BACKGROUND: Despite the improvement of therapeutic options for patients in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a complication with high mortality rates. Organ failure centrally determines the prognosis of these high-risk patients. Aim of the current study was to assess the incidence of hypoxic hepatitis (HH) in CS, its laboratory detection evaluating novel and established biomarkers and to estimate the prognostic relevance of HH in current clinical practice. METHODS: In 172 patients with CS complicating AMI, blood samples were collected at admission and after 1 day as prespecified subanalysis of the intra-aortic balloon pumping IABP-SHOCK II trial. Classic parameters of HH were measured in addition to argininosuccinate synthase 1 and sulfotransferase isoform SULT2A1 was determined as new biomarker using standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. All-cause mortality at 30 days was used for outcome assessment. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 40%. The incidence of HH with an increase of aminotransferase levels to be 20 times above the upper normal level was 18%. Patients with HH had a distinctly higher 30-day mortality rate compared to patients without HH (68 vs. 34%; p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment aspartate-aminotransferase (ASAT) remained an independent predictor of 30-day mortality together with serum lactate and serum creatinine, while the new biomarkers failed to predict outcome. Comparing different liver markers using receiver operating characteristic analysis, ASAT showed the highest area under the curve for the prediction of outcome. CONCLUSIONS:HH occurs frequently in CS and is associated with particular poor outcome. As conventional biomarker, ASAT is the strongest laboratory predictor of outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00491036.
Authors: Christian Jung; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha; Ingo Eitel; Steffen Desch; Gerhard Schuler; Hans R Figulla; Holger Thiele Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: V M van Deursen; K Damman; H L Hillege; A P van Beek; D J van Veldhuisen; A A Voors Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2009-09-26 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Robert J Goldberg; Frederick A Spencer; Joel M Gore; Darleen Lessard; Jorge Yarzebski Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-02-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Marc D Samsky; Chetan B Patel; Tracy A DeWald; Alastair D Smith; G Michael Felker; Joseph G Rogers; Adrian F Hernandez Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Karl Fengler; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Franz-Josef Neumann; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Antoinette de Waha; Suzanne de Waha; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Rainer Hambrecht; Jörg Fuhrmann; Michael Böhm; Janine Poess; Ruth Strasser; Steffen Schneider; Gerhard Schuler; Karl Werdan; Uwe Zeymer; Holger Thiele Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Georg Fuernau; Karl Fengler; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Franz-Josef Neumann; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Antoinette de Waha; Suzanne de Waha; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Rainer Hambrecht; Christian Jung; Michael Böhm; Janine Pöss; Ruth H Strasser; Steffen Schneider; Taoufik Ouarrak; Gerhard Schuler; Karl Werdan; Uwe Zeymer; Holger Thiele Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Bernhard Wernly; Clemens Seelmaier; David Leistner; Barbara E Stähli; Ingrid Pretsch; Michael Lichtenauer; Christian Jung; Uta C Hoppe; Ulf Landmesser; Holger Thiele; Alexander Lauten Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: M Diab; C Sponholz; C von Loeffelholz; P Scheffel; M Bauer; A Kortgen; T Lehmann; G Färber; M W Pletz; T Doenst Journal: Infection Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 3.553
Authors: Kevin Roedl; Dominik Jarczak; Andreas Drolz; Dominic Wichmann; Olaf Boenisch; Geraldine de Heer; Christoph Burdelski; Daniel Frings; Barbara Sensen; Axel Nierhaus; Marc Lütgehetmann; Stefan Kluge; Valentin Fuhrmann Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 6.925