| Literature DB >> 27928527 |
Ardak Kuanyshkaliyeva1, Nurbek Igissinov2, Asiya Turgambayeva1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We examined epidemiological aspects of dynamic changes in incidence of ovarian cancer in women of Kazakh and Russian nationalities in Kazakhstan.Entities:
Keywords: Component analysis; Ethnic groups; Incidence; Ovarian cancer
Year: 2016 PMID: 27928527 PMCID: PMC5139958
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Fig. 1:Change in the size of female population of Kazakhstan for 1999–2009
Fig. 2:The change in age structure of the female population (A – total, B – Kazakh, C – Russian) in Kazakhstan for 1999 to 2009 (%)
Component analysis of ovarian cancer incidence growth in Kazakhstan
| All female population | |||||||||
| <30 | 0.5150 | 0.4890 | −0.0260 | 1.20 | 1.17 | −0.03 | −0.031 | −0.014 | +0.001 |
| 30–39 | 0.1520 | 0.1420 | −0.0100 | 4.75 | 5.59 | +0.84 | −0.048 | +0.128 | −0.008 |
| 40–49 | 0.1282 | 0.1369 | +0.0087 | 13.49 | 14.99 | +1.5 | +0.117 | +0.193 | +0.013 |
| 50–59 | 0.0773 | 0.1093 | +0.0320 | 26.71 | 29.29 | +2.6 | +0.855 | +0.199 | +0.083 |
| 60–69 | 0.0707 | 0.0600 | −0.0107 | 30.47 | 30.75 | +0.3 | −0.326 | +0.020 | −0.003 |
| ≥70 | 0.0568 | 0.0629 | +0.0061 | 27.46 | 32.44 | +5.0 | +0.168 | +0.283 | +0.030 |
| Kazakh females | |||||||||
| <30 | 0.6013 | 0.5587 | −0.0426 | 1.32 | 0.95 | −0.37 | −0.056 | −0.225 | +0.016 |
| 30–39 | 0.1645 | 0.1530 | −0.0115 | 3.77 | 3.71 | −0.06 | −0.043 | −0.010 | +0.001 |
| 40–49 | 0.1088 | 0.1379 | +0.0291 | 12.78 | 13.50 | +0.7 | +0.372 | +0.079 | +0.021 |
| 50–59 | 0.0563 | 0.0779 | +0.0216 | 24.24 | 28.41 | +4.2 | +0.524 | +0.235 | +0.090 |
| 60–69 | 0.0385 | 0.0438 | +0.0053 | 27.68 | 24.60 | −3.1 | +0.147 | −0.119 | −0.016 |
| ≥70 | 0.0306 | 0.0287 | −0.0019 | 17.81 | 33.42 | +15.6 | −0.034 | +0.478 | −0.030 |
| Russian females | |||||||||
| <30 | 0.4024 | 0.3770 | −0.0254 | 1.43 | 1.79 | +0.36 | −0.036 | +0.144 | −0.009 |
| 30–39 | 0.1337 | 0.1244 | −0.0093 | 4.60 | 11.60 | +7.00 | −0.043 | +0.936 | −0.065 |
| 40–49 | 0.1567 | 0.1500 | −0.0067 | 16.76 | 17.00 | +0.2 | −0.112 | +0.038 | −0.002 |
| 50–59 | 0.1042 | 0.1421 | +0.0379 | 29.95 | 39.62 | +9.7 | +1.135 | +1.007 | +0.366 |
| 60–69 | 0.1104 | 0.1002 | −0.0102 | 37.20 | 34.11 | −3.1 | +0.379 | −0.341 | +0.031 |
| ≥70 | 0.0926 | 0.1063 | +0.0137 | 37.23 | 39.84 | +2.6 | +0.510 | +0.242 | +0.036 |
Component analysis of the dynamics of ovarian cancer incidence growth in Kazakhstan
| All female population | |||||||||
| <30 | 48 | 47 | 3992545 | 4002657 | 1.20 | 1.17 | 0.605 | 48.12 | |
| 30–39 | 56 | 65 | 1178431 | 1162483 | 4.75 | 5.59 | 0.850 | 55.2 | |
| 40–49 | 134 | 168 | 993472 | 1120570 | 13.49 | 14.99 | 1.921 | 151.1 | |
| 50–59 | 160 | 262 | 599011 | 894458 | 26.71 | 29.29 | 2.263 | 238.9 | |
| 60–69 | 167 | 151 | 548129 | 491025 | 30.47 | 30.75 | 2.174 | 149.6 | |
| ≥70 | 121 | 167 | 440564 | 514748 | 27.46 | 32.44 | 1.844 | 141.4 | |
| Total |
|
| |||||||
| Growth |
|
|
|
| |||||
| Kazakh females | |||||||||
| <30 | 32 | 27 | 2423355 | 2851763 | 1.32 | 0.95 | 0.866 | 118.70 | |
| 30–39 | 25 | 29 | 662820 | 780827 | 3.77 | 3.71 | 0.524 | 77.8 | |
| 40–49 | 56 | 95 | 438329 | 703716 | 12.78 | 13.50 | 0.734 | 100.9 | |
| 50–59 | 55 | 113 | 226907 | 397681 | 24.24 | 28.41 | 0.744 | 160.9 | |
| 60–69 | 43 | 55 | 155334 | 223607 | 27.68 | 24.60 | 0.725 | 74.5 | |
| ≥70 | 22 | 49 | 123547 | 146611 | 17.81 | 33.42 | 0.284 | 25.7 | |
| Total |
|
| |||||||
| Growth |
|
|
|
| |||||
| Russian females | |||||||||
| <30 | 14 | 14 | 980249 | 783563 | 1.43 | 1.79 | 0.866 | 118.70 | |
| 30–39 | 15 | 30 | 325782 | 258533 | 4.60 | 11.60 | 0.524 | 77.8 | |
| 40–49 | 64 | 53 | 381813 | 311686 | 16.76 | 17.00 | 0.734 | 100.9 | |
| 50–59 | 76 | 117 | 253724 | 295339 | 29.95 | 39.62 | 0.744 | 160.9 | |
| 60–69 | 100 | 71 | 268829 | 208134 | 37.20 | 34.11 | 0.725 | 74.5 | |
| ≥70 | 84 | 88 | 225617 | 220865 | 37.23 | 39.84 | 0.284 | 25.7 | |
| Total |
|
| |||||||
| Growth |
|
|
|
| |||||
Components of increase in the number of cases of ovarian cancer in Kazakhstan
| 1. Growth PN | +38 | +22.1 | +5.6 | +62 | +46.0 | +26.6 | −52 | −259.3 | −14.7 |
| 2. Changes ASP | +57 | +32.7 | +8.3 | +37 | +27.1 | +15.7 | +26 | +130.8 | +7.4 |
| 3. Combined effect of changes in PN and ASP | +3 | +1.8 | +0.5 | +10 | +7.2 | +4.2 | −4 | −19.2 | −1.1 |
| 4. Change of RP | +63 | +36.0 | +9.1 | +18 | +13.1 | +7.6 | +49 | +246.8 | +14.0 |
| 5. Combined effect of changes of RP and PN | +4 | +2.0 | +0.5 | +5 | +3.5 | +2.0 | −7 | −36.3 | −2.1 |
| 6. Combined effect of changes of RP and ASP | +9 | +5.1 | +1.3 | +3 | +2.4 | +1.4 | +9 | +43.6 | +2.5 |
| 7. Combined effect of the changes RP, PN and ASP | 0 | +0.3 | +0.1 | +1 | +0.6 | +0.4 | −1 | −6.4 | −0.4 |
Growth population number ΔP=+22.1% (Kazakh – ΔP=+46.1, Russian – ΔP=−259.3%);
Changes in the Age Structure of the population ΔA=+32.7% (Kazakh – ΔA=+15.7%, Russian – ΔA=+130.8%).
Combined effect of changes in population number and its age structure ΔPA=+1.8% (Kazakh – ΔPA=+7.2%, Russian – ΔPA=−19.2%).
Change of infection risk ΔR=+36.0% (Kazakh – ΔR=+13.1%, Russian – ΔR=+246.8%).
Combined effect of changes in the disease risk and population number ΔPR=+2.0% (Kazakh – ΔPR=+3.5%, Russian – ΔPR=−36.3%).
Combined effect of changes in the disease risk and age structure of the population ΔAR=+5.1% (Kazakh – ΔAR=+3.5%, Russian – ΔAR=−36.3%).
Combined effect of the changes in the disease risk of the population and its age structure ΔPAR=+0.3% (Kazakh – ΔPAR=+0.6%, Russian – ΔPAR=−6.4%).