Liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma commonly form nodular lesions in the liver parenchyma. We report a case of liver metastasis from rectal adenocarcinoma that extended predominantly into the bile duct. A 62-year-old Japanese man underwent low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma 9 years ago. Approximately 3 years later, he underwent radiofrequency ablation therapy for a metastatic liver tumor. Nine years after surgery, a tumor in liver segment III exhibiting intrabiliary extension was discovered; it was unclear if this was a metastatic liver tumor or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Accordingly, we performed a left hepatectomy with lymph node dissection. The tumor was negative for cytokeratins 7 and 20, and was histologically similar to the primary rectal adenocarcinoma; it was diagnosed as rectal carcinoma metastasis. The patient has survived for 3 years after the hepatic surgery, for 9 years after radiofrequency ablation therapy, and for 12 years after the primary surgery. This case shows that liver metastasis from colorectal carcinoma can present as a predominantly intrabiliary growth that mimics intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma on imaging. Moreover, our case provides evidence for the superiority of anatomical hepatectomy over partial hepatectomy for metastatic liver tumors with intrabiliary growth arising from rectal adenocarcinomas.
Liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma commonly form nodular lesions in the liver parenchyma. We report a case of liver metastasis from rectal adenocarcinoma that extended predominantly into the bile duct. A 62-year-old Japanese man underwent low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma 9 years ago. Approximately 3 years later, he underwent radiofrequency ablation therapy for a metastatic liver tumor. Nine years after surgery, a tumor in liver segment III exhibiting intrabiliary extension was discovered; it was unclear if this was a metastatic liver tumor or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Accordingly, we performed a left hepatectomy with lymph node dissection. The tumor was negative for cytokeratins 7 and 20, and was histologically similar to the primary rectal adenocarcinoma; it was diagnosed as rectal carcinoma metastasis. The patient has survived for 3 years after the hepatic surgery, for 9 years after radiofrequency ablation therapy, and for 12 years after the primary surgery. This case shows that liver metastasis from colorectal carcinoma can present as a predominantly intrabiliary growth that mimics intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma on imaging. Moreover, our case provides evidence for the superiority of anatomical hepatectomy over partial hepatectomy for metastatic liver tumors with intrabiliary growth arising from rectal adenocarcinomas.
Liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma (CRC) commonly form nodular lesions in the liver
parenchyma[1]). However, there
have been reports of unusual cases of metastatic liver tumors from CRC that predominantly
extend along the intrahepatic bile duct[2],[3],[4]). Such unusual tumors generally mimic intrahepatic
cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) clinically, radiographically, and pathologically[5],[6],[7]). Importantly, it remains unclear whether anatomical or partial
hepatectomy is more suitable to treat such tumors. Herein, we report a case of liver
metastasis from CRC presenting as an intrabiliary growth, and discuss the
clinicopathological considerations that inform selection of the surgical procedure for such
tumors.
Case Report
The patient was a 62-year-old Japanese man who had undergone low anterior resection for
rectal carcinoma 9 years earlier. The pathological stage of the rectal carcinoma was stage
II (T3N0M0). Histologically, the tumor was a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with
lymphovascular invasion (Figure 1a, b). Three years and 2 months after the surgery, a metastatic tumor was found in liver
segment VI. The patient chose radiofrequency ablation therapy (RFA) over surgery. During a
post-RFA follow-up period of 6 years and 1 month, his serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)
and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels remained within the normal ranges. However, 1
week before admission, serum CEA and CA19-9 levels were elevated to 6.8 ng/dL (normal range,
<5.0 ng/dL) and 40.3 U/mL (normal range, <37.0 U/mL), respectively.
Figure 1
The primary rectal adenocarcinoma. Macroscopically, an irregular, reddish, ulcerated
mass measuring 6 × 5 cm in size was found on the mucosal surface of the rectum (a,
arrow). The tumor was diagnosed as a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (b,
hematoxylin and eosin, × 200).
The primary rectal adenocarcinoma. Macroscopically, an irregular, reddish, ulcerated
mass measuring 6 × 5 cm in size was found on the mucosal surface of the rectum (a,
arrow). The tumor was diagnosed as a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (b,
hematoxylin and eosin, × 200).On admission to our hospital, the patient exhibited no abnormalities on physical
examination. Complete blood counts and serum chemistry profiles were within normal limits.
Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed distention of the superior branch
of the bile duct in segment III of the liver (B3) (Figure
2a) as well as a nodule in the same segment (Figure
2b). A slightly enhancing lesion extended along the inferior branch of B3 (Figure 2b). Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging
revealed a tumor along the inferior branch of B3, with a low-intensity signal on T1-weighted
images (Figure 3a) and an isointense signal with background liver parenchyma on T2-weighted images
(Figure 3b). On diffusion-weighted images, the
lesion in the inferior branch of B3 exhibited a high-intensity signal (Figure 3c). Based on these findings, the differential diagnoses were
metastatic liver tumor from rectal carcinoma and IHCC. Hence, we performed a left
hepatectomy with dissection of the lymph nodes in the hepatoduodenal ligament.
Figure 2
Preoperative computed tomography findings. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed
tomography reveals distention of the superior branch of the bile duct of segment III
of the liver (B3; arrow in [a]) and a nodule in the same segment (arrow in [b]). A
slightly enhancing lesion extends along the inferior branch of B3 (arrowhead in
[b]).
Figure 3
Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings. Abdominal magnetic resonance
imaging shows a tumor (indicated by the arrow) along the bile duct in the left lateral
segment, with a low-intensity signal on T1-weighted images (a), an isointense signal
with background liver parenchyma on T2-weighted images (b), and a high-intensity
signal on diffusion weighted images (c).
Preoperative computed tomography findings. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed
tomography reveals distention of the superior branch of the bile duct of segment III
of the liver (B3; arrow in [a]) and a nodule in the same segment (arrow in [b]). A
slightly enhancing lesion extends along the inferior branch of B3 (arrowhead in
[b]).Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings. Abdominal magnetic resonance
imaging shows a tumor (indicated by the arrow) along the bile duct in the left lateral
segment, with a low-intensity signal on T1-weighted images (a), an isointense signal
with background liver parenchyma on T2-weighted images (b), and a high-intensity
signal on diffusion weighted images (c).Macroscopically, a whitish nodule, measuring 1.5 × 1.0 cm, was found in the parenchyma of
segment III adjacent to the inferior surface of the liver (Figure 4). The tumor involved the inferior branch of B3 and extended along it. The superior
branch of B3 and the bile duct in segment II were preserved.
Figure 4
Macroscopic findings of the liver tumor. Macroscopically, a whitish nodule measuring
1.5 × 1.0 cm is observed in segment III adjacent to the inferior surface of the liver
(arrow). The figure shows that the tumor involves the inferior branch of the bile duct
in segment III and predominantly extends along it (arrowheads). The boxed area is
highlighted in Figure 5.
Macroscopic findings of the liver tumor. Macroscopically, a whitish nodule measuring
1.5 × 1.0 cm is observed in segment III adjacent to the inferior surface of the liver
(arrow). The figure shows that the tumor involves the inferior branch of the bile duct
in segment III and predominantly extends along it (arrowheads). The boxed area is
highlighted in Figure 5.
Figure 5
Histological findings of the liver tumor. The histological appearance of the area
highlighted by the solid box in Figure 4 is
shown. On gross appearance (a), the tumor presented with intrabiliary growth.
Histological examination shows an adenocarcinoma with intrabiliary growth replacing
the bile duct epithelium (b, c). The boxes with solid and dashed borders in (a) are
highlighted in panels (b) and (c), respectively. Asterisks in (a) and (c) indicate
necrotic tissue. The adjacent bile duct shows no cellular atypia (b, c). High-power
magnification shows that the cells of the liver tumor contained pencil-like and
hyperchromatic nuclei (d). Insets in (b) and (c) are digital enlargements of the
highlighted areas in each respective figure. Hematoxylin and eosin: (a) loupe view;
(b) × 20; (c) × 20; (d) × 100.
Histological examination revealed that an adenocarcinoma showed predominantly intraductal
papillary growth replacing the bile duct epithelium (Figure 5a, b, c). The tumor cells showed abrupt transition to the adjacent bile duct, which in turn
showed no cellular atypia (Figure 5b, c). The
tumor cells of the liver contained pencil-like hyperchromatic nuclei (Figure 5d). These histological findings were consistent with liver
metastasis from primary rectal adenocarcinoma. The intrahepatic arteries and portal veins
were preserved. The tumors (Figure 6a) were negative for cytokeratin (CK) 7 and CK20 on immunohistochemical analysis (Figure 6b, c), whereas the normal biliary epithelium
was positive for CK7 and negative for CK20 (Figure 6b,
c). CA19-9 was absent in the tumor cells, but present in the biliary epithelial
cells (Figure 6d). Because both the original and
metastatic tumors demonstrated strikingly similar histological appearances, the tumor was
diagnosed as a liver metastasis from rectal carcinoma.
Figure 6
Immunohistochemical analysis of the liver tumor. The tumor regions from panel (a)
were stained with various antibodies. The tumor cells are negative for cytokeratin
(CK) 7 expression (arrow in [b]), while the neighboring biliary epithelial cells show
positive CK7 staining (arrowhead in [b]) (b). Both the tumor cells (arrow in [c]) and
biliary epithelial cells (arrowhead in [c]) are negative for CK20 (c). The tumor cells
(arrow in [d]) are negative for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) while the biliary
epithelial cells (arrowhead in [d]) are positive for CA19-9 (d). (a) hematoxylin and
eosin; (b) CK7; (c) CK20; (d) CA19-9 ×100.
Histological findings of the liver tumor. The histological appearance of the area
highlighted by the solid box in Figure 4 is
shown. On gross appearance (a), the tumor presented with intrabiliary growth.
Histological examination shows an adenocarcinoma with intrabiliary growth replacing
the bile duct epithelium (b, c). The boxes with solid and dashed borders in (a) are
highlighted in panels (b) and (c), respectively. Asterisks in (a) and (c) indicate
necrotic tissue. The adjacent bile duct shows no cellular atypia (b, c). High-power
magnification shows that the cells of the liver tumor contained pencil-like and
hyperchromatic nuclei (d). Insets in (b) and (c) are digital enlargements of the
highlighted areas in each respective figure. Hematoxylin and eosin: (a) loupe view;
(b) × 20; (c) × 20; (d) × 100.Immunohistochemical analysis of the liver tumor. The tumor regions from panel (a)
were stained with various antibodies. The tumor cells are negative for cytokeratin
(CK) 7 expression (arrow in [b]), while the neighboring biliary epithelial cells show
positive CK7 staining (arrowhead in [b]) (b). Both the tumor cells (arrow in [c]) and
biliary epithelial cells (arrowhead in [c]) are negative for CK20 (c). The tumor cells
(arrow in [d]) are negative for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) while the biliary
epithelial cells (arrowhead in [d]) are positive for CA19-9 (d). (a) hematoxylin and
eosin; (b) CK7; (c) CK20; (d) CA19-9 ×100.The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and received adjuvant chemotherapy with
capecitabine. He has not exhibited any signs of recurrence in the liver or any other organ,
and is functioning well 3 years after the most recent surgery. The patient provided written
informed consent for reporting this case.
Discussion
In the present case, a metastatic tumor from CRC involved the inferior branch of B3 and
extended predominantly along this branch, with an intraductal papillary growth pattern.
Comparison between computed tomography images obtained 6 months before admission and those
obtained on admission showed the growth of the tumor (Figure 7a, b). On images obtained 6 months before admission, a nodule with a slightly low
attenuation, measuring 1.5 × 1.0 cm in diameter, was retrospectively discovered close to the
inferior surface of the liver (Figure 7a, right).
Neither enlargement of the superior branch of B3 nor tumor extension along the inferior
branch of B3 was observed 6 months prior to admission (Figure 7a; left, center, and right). At the time of admission, this nodule had
already involved the inferior branch of B3 (Figure
7b). Owing to a tumor embolism in the bifurcation of B3, the superior branch of B3
was enlarged on admission (Figure 7b). The
increased tumor volume and bile duct obstruction may explain the slight elevation of the
serum CEA and CA19-9 levels, respectively.
Figure 7
Comparison between the computed tomography images obtained 6 months before (a) and on
admission (b). Six months before admission (a), a slightly low attenuated nodule
measuring 1.5 × 1.0 cm in diameter was found close to the inferior surface of the
liver (arrow in [a], far right panel). On admission (b), the nodule (asterisk in [b],
far right panel) extended along the inferior branch of the bile duct in segment III
(B3) (arrowheads in [b], center and right panels). Owing to a tumor embolism in the
bifurcation of B3, the superior branch was enlarged on admission (box in [b], left
panel). Neither enlargement of the superior branch of B3 nor tumor extension along the
inferior branch of B3 was observed 6 months before admission ([a], left, center, and
right).
Comparison between the computed tomography images obtained 6 months before (a) and on
admission (b). Six months before admission (a), a slightly low attenuated nodule
measuring 1.5 × 1.0 cm in diameter was found close to the inferior surface of the
liver (arrow in [a], far right panel). On admission (b), the nodule (asterisk in [b],
far right panel) extended along the inferior branch of the bile duct in segment III
(B3) (arrowheads in [b], center and right panels). Owing to a tumor embolism in the
bifurcation of B3, the superior branch was enlarged on admission (box in [b], left
panel). Neither enlargement of the superior branch of B3 nor tumor extension along the
inferior branch of B3 was observed 6 months before admission ([a], left, center, and
right).Liver metastases from CRC occasionally involve the bile duct and show intraductal papillary
growth. According to a study by Okano et al., 10% of liver metastases from
CRC show intrabiliary growth macroscopically[2]). Similarly, Kubo et al. reported that 10.6%
(23/217) of liver metastases from CRC presented with macroscopic intrabiliary
growth[3]). A report from
Jannelyn et al. on liver metastasis from CRC concluded that 3.6% (41/1144)
and 10.6% (18/170) of retrospectively and prospectively analyzed cases, respectively,
presented with intrabiliary growth[4]).Liver metastasis from CRC with intrabiliary growth is associated with a better prognosis
than other forms of liver metastases. Okano et al. reported that patients
with macroscopic bile duct invasion had a better 5-year survival rate (80%) than those with
microscopic bile duct invasion (48%) or no bile duct invasion (57%)[2]). They also identified macroscopic
invasion as an independent prognostic variable[2]). Moreover, Kubo et al. reported a significant
difference between patients with and without macroscopic intrabiliary extension in terms of
the interval between initial colectomy and hepatectomy (37.4 ± 25.4 vs. 6.1 ± 7.2 months,
respectively)[3]). These
different outcomes may be explained by the fact that most tumors with intrabiliary growth
are well-differentiated adenocarcinomas[2], [3]). This feature is characteristic of less aggressive tumors and
results in tumor colonization of the bile duct; the normal biliary epithelium is replaced
with tumor cells, which grow along an intact basement membrane without penetrating
it[8]). The clinical course of
the patient presented here was consistent with that of a less aggressive tumor; he had a
well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with intrabiliary extension and has survived for 3 years
after the hepatic surgery, for 9 years after RFA, and for 12 years after the primary surgery
of the rectum.Preoperative differentiation between liver metastasis from CRC with intrabiliary growth and
IHCC is difficult. There are no clinical symptoms that are highly characteristic of liver
metastasis from CRC with intrabiliary growth[8], [9]). While elevated CEA and serum alkaline phosphatase levels are
common findings on laboratory tests[8],
[9]), these markers can
also be elevated in IHCC patients[10],
[11]). The computed
tomography findings of liver metastasis from CRC with intrabiliary growth are usually
nonspecific, although a thickened portal tract, intrahepatic bile duct dilatation, and a
wedge-shaped area with contrast enhancement are characteristic features of this type of
tumor[12]). On the other
hand, cholangiocarcinoma presents with a broad range of appearances on radiography[13], [14]).Importantly, this case provides evidence for the superiority of anatomical hepatectomy over
partial hepatectomy for metastatic liver tumors with intrabiliary growth arising from rectal
adenocarcinomas. When liver metastases from CRC form nodular lesions in the liver
parenchyma, partial hepatectomy may be a sufficient treatment[15]); however, when the tumor shows intrabiliary
spreading, as seen in the present case, partial hepatectomy alone may not completely excise
the tumor because of the extension along the bile ducts[16]). Although there is no consensus regarding the most
appropriate procedure for such patients, anatomical hepatectomy tends to be preferred over
regional liver resection[7],
[9], [17],[18],[19]). This is primarily to guard against the possibility of
residual tumor cells on the cut margin of the bile duct[7], [9],
[17],[18],[19]). Moreover, anatomical hepatectomy is the logical
choice because of the aforementioned difficulty in preoperatively differentiating between a
liver metastasis with intrabiliary growth arising from CRC and IHCC. In the present case, we
performed a left hepatectomy with sufficient margins in the bile duct that resulted in good
postoperative outcome; the patient has survived for a relatively long period.Pathological discrimination between liver metastasis from CRC and IHCC should be performed
carefully, based on both conventional histological examination using hematoxylin and eosin
staining and immunohistochemical staining with antibodies against CK7 and CK20. This
procedure is particularly important to determine the need for, and the selection of,
chemotherapy. It is also important in prognosis prediction. Metastatic liver tumors from CRC
with macroscopic intrabiliary growth show a histologically abrupt transition from the
adjacent bile duct epithelium to tumor tissue: cellular atypia is absent in the normal bile
duct epithelial cells[8]). On
immunohistochemical analysis, a typical CK7–/CK20+ expression pattern is generally observed
in CRC[20],[21],[22]). In contrast, biliary epithelial cells show a
CK7+/CK20– pattern[19],[20],[21],[22]). However, according to Tot et al., 9%
(18/206) of metastatic liver tumors from CRC were negative for both CK7 and CK20
expression[23]). Similarly,
Sasaki et al. reported that 16% (4/25) of liver metastases from CRC were
CK7–/CK20–[24]), whereas
Rullier et al. reported that no CK7–/CK20– cholangiocarcinomas were found
among their cases (0/29)[21]). In
the present case, the liver tumor showed a histological appearance similar to that of the
primary tumor, as well as an abrupt change from the normal bile duct epithelium to the
adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a CK7–/CK20– expression pattern. The
tumor was ultimately diagnosed as a metastasis from the primary CRC.However, intrahepatic recurrence of the segment VI metastatic lesion treated with RFA 6
years before admission cannot be completely ruled out. Intrahepatic recurrences after
treatment of metastatic liver tumors from CRC show diverse patterns, including local
recurrence, multiple hepatic nodules, and intrahepatic distant metastases[25]). Therefore, it is possible that
ours is a rare case of intrahepatic recurrence.In conclusion, we report an unusual case of liver metastasis from rectal adenocarcinoma
that presented with intrabiliary growth (Figure
8). During follow-up, physicians should consider the possibility of liver metastasis
with intrabiliary growth for patients with a history of CRC. Moreover, our patient’s long
survival time suggests that anatomical hepatectomy is a more effective treatment than
partial hepatectomy for metastatic liver tumors from CRC with intrabiliary growth.
Figure 8
Schematic representation of the tumor extension in the present case. The metastatic
nodule formed in segment III of the peripheral liver in, and involved the inferior
branch of the bile duct in segment III, resulting in distention of the superior branch
of the bile duct in segment III. Note that the bile duct in segment II is preserved.
Abbreviations: CHD, common hepatic duct; RHD, right hepatic duct; B2, bile duct in
segment II; B3, bile duct in segment III; B3a, superior branch of B3; B3b, inferior
branch of B3.
Schematic representation of the tumor extension in the present case. The metastatic
nodule formed in segment III of the peripheral liver in, and involved the inferior
branch of the bile duct in segment III, resulting in distention of the superior branch
of the bile duct in segment III. Note that the bile duct in segment II is preserved.
Abbreviations: CHD, common hepatic duct; RHD, right hepatic duct; B2, bile duct in
segment II; B3, bile duct in segment III; B3a, superior branch of B3; B3b, inferior
branch of B3.
Authors: K Yasui; T Hirai; T Kato; A Torii; K Uesaka; T Morimoto; Y Kodera; Y Yamamura; T Kito; N Hamajima Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Nisha I Sainani; Onofrio A Catalano; Nagaraj-Setty Holalkere; Andrew X Zhu; Peter F Hahn; Dushyant V Sahani Journal: Radiographics Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.333