Literature DB >> 27928172

Clinical indications, complications, and long-term outcome of esophageal surgeries in 27 horses.

Judith B Koenig1, Andressa Silveira1, Nicola C Cribb1, Perrine Piat1, Sheila Laverty1, Ulrike S Sorge1.   

Abstract

The main objective of this retrospective study was to describe clinical findings, management, and short- and long-term outcome in 27 horses that underwent various surgical techniques for esophageal disease. Surgical techniques (sometimes concurrently) performed were: esophagostomy (n = 14), esophagotomy with primary closure (n = 6), esophagomyotomy (n = 3), and esophagoplasty (n = 2). Esophageal perforation in 5 horses was treated by ventral drainage; 3 horses had the esophageal defect sutured (n = 3). Feeding tubes were placed in 15 horses. Postoperative complications occurred in 52% (14/27) with a median of 3 complications/horse (range: 1 to 7). Significantly more complications occurred in horses with a perforated esophagus. Eighteen horses (18/27; 67%) were discharged. Most horses (8/9; 89%) with a lesion located in the proximal esophagus were discharged. Horses with a higher number of postoperative complications, particularly postoperative infection, were more likely to be euthanized. One year after surgery, 41% of the horses were alive and free of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27928172      PMCID: PMC5109628     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Vet J        ISSN: 0008-5286            Impact factor:   1.008


  8 in total

1.  Esophagomyotomy and esophagopexy to create a diverticulum for treatment of chronic esophageal stricture in 2 horses.

Authors:  J D Lillich; K E Frees; K Warrington; P D Van Harreveld; E M Gaughan; W L Beard
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.495

2.  Esophageal obstruction in horses: a retrospective study of 34 cases.

Authors:  K Feige; C Schwarzwald; A Fürst; B Kaser-Hotz
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Surgical repair of an esophageal stricture in a horse.

Authors:  D Craig; R Todhunter
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.495

4.  Esophageal healing in the pony: comparison of sutured vs nonsutured esophagotomy.

Authors:  J A Stick; J D Krehbiel; D J Kunze; J A Wortman
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 1.156

5.  Equine cervical esophagostomy: complications associated with duration and location of feeding tubes.

Authors:  J A Stick; F J Derksen; E A Scott
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 1.156

6.  Clinical features and prognostic variables in 109 horses with esophageal obstruction (1992-2009).

Authors:  L Chiavaccini; D M Hassel
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Esophageal disorders in 61 horses. Results of nonsurgical and surgical management.

Authors:  D R Craig; D R Shivy; R L Pankowski; H N Erb
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.495

8.  Esophageal perforation: the importance of early diagnosis and primary repair.

Authors:  Atilla Eroglu; Ibrahim Can Kürkçüogu; Nurettin Karaoganogu; Celal Tekinbaş; Omer Yimaz; Mahmut Başog
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.429

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.