Literature DB >> 27927782

Modeling fast and slow gamma oscillations with interneurons of different subtype.

Stephen Keeley1, André A Fenton2, John Rinzel2,3.   

Abstract

Experimental and theoretical studies demonstrate that neuronal gamma oscillations crucially depend on interneurons, but current models do not consider the diversity of known interneuron subtypes. Moreover, in CA1 of the hippocampus, experimental evidence indicates the presence of multiple gamma oscillators, two of which may be coordinated by differing interneuron populations. In this article, we show that models of networks with competing interneuron populations with different postsynaptic effects are sufficient to generate, within CA1, distinct oscillatory regimes. We find that strong mutual inhibition between the interneuron populations permits distinct fast and slow gamma states, whereas weak mutual inhibition generates mixed gamma states. We develop idealized firing rate models to illuminate dynamic properties of these competitive gamma networks, and reinforce these concepts with basic spiking models. The models make several explicit predictions about gamma oscillators in CA1. Specifically, interneurons of different subtype phase-lock to different gamma states, and one population of interneurons is silenced and the other active during fast and slow gamma events. Finally, mutual inhibition between interneuron populations is necessary to generate distinct gamma states. Previous experimental studies indicate that fast and slow gamma oscillations reflect different information processing modes, although it is unclear whether these rhythms are intrinsic or imposed. The models outlined demonstrate that basic architectures can locally generate these oscillations, as well as capture other features of fast and slow gamma, including theta-phase preference and spontaneous transitions between gamma states. These models may extend to describe general dynamics in networks with diverse interneuron populations.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The oscillatory coordination of neural signals is crucial to healthy brain function. We have developed an idealized neuronal model that generates distinct fast and slow gamma oscillations, a known feature of the rodent hippocampus. Our work provides a mechanism of this phenomenon, as well as a theoretical framework for future experiments concerning hippocampal gamma. It moreover offers a tractable model of competitive gamma oscillations that is generalizable across the nervous system.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamical systems; gamma; hippocampus; interneuron; oscillations

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27927782      PMCID: PMC5338627          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00490.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  60 in total

1.  Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.

Authors:  P Fries; J H Reynolds; A E Rorie; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Background gamma rhythmicity and attention in cortical local circuits: a computational study.

Authors:  Christoph Börgers; Steven Epstein; Nancy J Kopell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Neural syntax: cell assemblies, synapsembles, and readers.

Authors:  György Buzsáki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Gamma oscillation by synaptic inhibition in a hippocampal interneuronal network model.

Authors:  X J Wang; G Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons.

Authors:  H R Wilson; J D Cowan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Dual γ rhythm generators control interlaminar synchrony in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Matthew Ainsworth; Shane Lee; Mark O Cunningham; Anita K Roopun; Roger D Traub; Nancy J Kopell; Miles A Whittington
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Total number and ratio of excitatory and inhibitory synapses converging onto single interneurons of different types in the CA1 area of the rat hippocampus.

Authors:  A I Gulyás; M Megías; Z Emri; T F Freund
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Oscillatory dynamics and place field maps reflect hippocampal ensemble processing of sequence and place memory under NMDA receptor control.

Authors:  Henrique O Cabral; Martin Vinck; Celine Fouquet; Cyriel M A Pennartz; Laure Rondi-Reig; Francesco P Battaglia
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  Neuronal diversity and temporal dynamics: the unity of hippocampal circuit operations.

Authors:  Thomas Klausberger; Peter Somogyi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Strength and duration of perisomatic GABAergic inhibition depend on distance between synaptically connected cells.

Authors:  Michael Strüber; Peter Jonas; Marlene Bartos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  20 in total

1.  Deletion of Fmr1 from Forebrain Excitatory Neurons Triggers Abnormal Cellular, EEG, and Behavioral Phenotypes in the Auditory Cortex of a Mouse Model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan W Lovelace; Maham Rais; Arnold R Palacios; Xinghao S Shuai; Steven Bishay; Otilia Popa; Patricia S Pirbhoy; Devin K Binder; David L Nelson; Iryna M Ethell; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Firing rate models for gamma oscillations.

Authors:  Stephen Keeley; Áine Byrne; André Fenton; John Rinzel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Target-cell-specific Short-term Plasticity Reduces the Excitatory Drive onto CA1 Interneurons Relative to Pyramidal Cells During Physiologically-derived Spike Trains.

Authors:  Hua Yu Sun; Qin Li; Aundrea F Bartley; Lynn E Dobrunz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Excitatory/Inhibitory Responses Shape Coherent Neuronal Dynamics Driven by Optogenetic Stimulation in the Primate Brain.

Authors:  Ryan A Shewcraft; Heather L Dean; Margaret M Fabiszak; Maureen A Hagan; Yan T Wong; Bijan Pesaran
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Combining hypothesis- and data-driven neuroscience modeling in FAIR workflows.

Authors:  Olivia Eriksson; Upinder Singh Bhalla; Kim T Blackwell; Sharon M Crook; Daniel Keller; Andrei Kramer; Marja-Leena Linne; Ausra Saudargienė; Rebecca C Wade; Jeanette Hellgren Kotaleski
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Phencyclidine Discoordinates Hippocampal Network Activity But Not Place Fields.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Kao; Dino Dvořák; EunHye Park; Jana Kenney; Eduard Kelemen; André A Fenton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Translation-relevant EEG phenotypes in a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Jonathan W Lovelace; Iryna M Ethell; Devin K Binder; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 5.996

8.  Electrophysiology of the Human Superior Temporal Sulcus during Speech Processing.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Mitchell Steinschneider; Ariane E Rhone; Christopher K Kovach; Matthew I Banks; Bryan M Krause; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 4.861

9.  Firing rate equations require a spike synchrony mechanism to correctly describe fast oscillations in inhibitory networks.

Authors:  Federico Devalle; Alex Roxin; Ernest Montbrió
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Control of recollection by slow gamma dominating mid-frequency gamma in hippocampus CA1.

Authors:  Dino Dvorak; Basma Radwan; Fraser T Sparks; Zoe Nicole Talbot; André A Fenton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.