Literature DB >> 27927604

Factors predicting failure of noninvasive ventilation assist for preventing reintubation among medical critically ill patients.

Preecha Thomrongpairoj1, Surat Tongyoo2, Withaya Tragulmongkol1, Chairat Permpikul1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reintubation after failed extubation is associated with high mortality. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been used to prevent reintubation, but the results have been inconclusive. We investigated the factors predicting failure of NIV-assisted extubation among medical critically ill patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who were admitted to medical intensive care units at Siriraj Hospital between March 2012 and August 2015 who required more than 48 hours of mechanical ventilation and who received NIV after endotracheal extubation. NIV was considered to have failed if the patient required reintubation during intensive care unit admission.
RESULTS: A total of 105 patients (57 male; mean age, 63.3±17.9 years) were enrolled. The reintubation rate was 45.7%. Univariate analysis identified pre-NIV Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment score >3.5, respiratory failure caused by pneumonia, heart rate after NIV for 1 hour of more 100 beats per minute, fluid accumulation greater than 100 mL/kg, and NIV duration more than 96 hours as factors associated with reintubation. However, multivariate analysis identified pneumonia as the only predictive factor for failure of NIV-assisted extubation among critically ill patients. Reintubated patients had significantly higher hospital mortality than successfully extubated patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory failure caused by pneumonia is predictive of failure of NIV-assisted extubation.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Failed extubation; NIV; Noninvasive ventilation; Reintubation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27927604     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.11.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  3 in total

1.  Early decongestive therapy versus high-flow nasal cannula for the prevention of adverse clinical events in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

Authors:  Sang Yong Om; Junho Hyun; Kyung Hun Nam; Sun Hack Lee; Seung Min Song; Jung Ae Hong; Sang Eun Lee; Min-Seok Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  A novel machine learning model to predict respiratory failure and invasive mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients suffering from COVID-19.

Authors:  Itai Bendavid; Liran Statlender; Leonid Shvartser; Shmuel Teppler; Roy Azullay; Rotem Sapir; Pierre Singer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Surat Tongyoo; Porntipa Tantibundit; Kiattichai Daorattanachai; Tanuwong Viarasilpa; Chairat Permpikul; Suthipol Udompanturak
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 6.925

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.