Literature DB >> 27927523

Adult Spinal Deformity Surgeons Are Unable to Accurately Predict Postoperative Spinal Alignment Using Clinical Judgment Alone.

Tamir Ailon1, Justin K Scheer2, Virginie Lafage3, Frank J Schwab3, Eric Klineberg4, Daniel M Sciubba5, Themistocles S Protopsaltis6, Lukas Zebala7, Richard Hostin8, Ibrahim Obeid9, Tyler Koski2, Michael P Kelly7, Shay Bess6, Christopher I Shaffrey10, Justin S Smith11, Christopher P Ames12.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery seeks to reduce disability and improve quality of life through restoration of spinal alignment. In particular, correction of sagittal malalignment is correlated with patient outcome. Inadequate correction of sagittal deformity is not infrequent. The present study assessed surgeons' ability to accurately predict postoperative alignment.
METHODS: Seventeen cases were presented with preoperative radiographic measurements, and a summary of the operation as performed by the treating physician. Surgeon training, practice characteristics, and use of surgical planning software was assessed. Participants predicted if the surgical plan would lead to adequate deformity correction and attempted to predict postoperative radiographic parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK).
RESULTS: Seventeen surgeons participated: 71% within 0 to 10 years of practice; 88% devote >25% of their practice to deformity surgery. Surgeons accurately judged adequacy of the surgical plan to achieve correction to specific thresholds of SVA 69% ± 8%, PT 68% ± 9%, and PI-LL 68% ± 11% of the time. However, surgeons correctly predicted the actual postoperative radiographic parameters only 42% ± 6% of the time. They were more successful at predicting PT (61% ± 10%) than SVA (45% ± 8%), PI-LL (26% ± 11%), or TK change (35% ± 21%; p < .05). Improved performance correlated with greater focus on deformity but not number of years in practice or number of three-column osteotomies performed per year.
CONCLUSION: Surgeons failed to correctly predict the adequacy of the proposed surgical plan in approximately one third of presented cases. They were better at determining whether a surgical plan would achieve adequate correction than predicting specific postoperative alignment parameters. Pelvic tilt and SVA were predicted with the greatest accuracy.
Copyright © 2016 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult scoliosis; Adult spinal deformity; Deformity correction; Spinal alignment; Surgical planning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27927523     DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  8 in total

Review 1.  Self-learning computers for surgical planning and prediction of postoperative alignment.

Authors:  Renaud Lafage; Sébastien Pesenti; Virginie Lafage; Frank J Schwab
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [What is actually adult spinal deformity? : Development, classification, and indications for surgical treatment].

Authors:  D Adler; H Almansour; M Akbar
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Automatic analysis of global spinal alignment from simple annotation of vertebral bodies.

Authors:  Sophia A Doerr; Tharindu De Silva; Rohan Vijayan; Runze Han; Ali Uneri; Michael D Ketcha; Xiaoxuan Zhang; Nishanth Khanna; Erick Westbroek; Bowen Jiang; Corinna Zygourakis; Nafi Aygun; Nicholas Theodore; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-05-13

Review 4.  Low back pain in older adults: risk factors, management options and future directions.

Authors:  Arnold Yl Wong; Jaro Karppinen; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-04-18

5.  Thoracic Reciprocal Change Can Be Predicted Before Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Koji Ishikawa; Yusuke Nakao; Fumihiko Oguchi; Tomoaki Toyone; Shigeo Sano
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-29

6.  Can Machine Learning Accurately Predict Postoperative Compensation for the Uninstrumented Thoracic Spine and Pelvis After Fusion From the Lower Thoracic Spine to the Sacrum?

Authors:  Nathan J Lee; Zeeshan M Sardar; Venkat Boddapati; Justin Mathew; Meghan Cerpa; Eric Leung; Joseph Lombardi; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-10-08

7.  In the Relationship Between Change in Kyphosis and Change in Lordosis: Which Drives Which?

Authors:  Bryan Ang; Renaud Lafage; Jonathan Charles Elysée; Tejbir S Pannu; Mathieu Bannwarth; Brandon B Carlson; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-04-01

8.  Does Local Administration of Liposomal Bupivacaine Reduce Pain and Narcotic Consumption in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery?

Authors:  Andrew S Chung; Dennis Crandall; Jan Revella; Biodun Adeniyi; Yu Hui H Chang; Michael S Chang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-06-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.