Literature DB >> 27927496

Lumbosacral Junctional Failures After Long Spinal Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity-Which Vertebra Is the Preferred Distal Instrumented Vertebra?

Tatsuya Yasuda1, Tomohiko Hasegawa2, Yu Yamato2, Sho Kobayashi2, Daisuke Togawa2, Tomohiro Banno2, Hideyuki Arima2, Shin Oe2, Yukihiro Matsuyama2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECT: To investigate the rate of lumbosacral junction complication after long corrective spinal fusion for degenerative kyphoscoliosis cases with different lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) of L5, S1 (non-iliac group), and ilium (iliac group). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In long spinal fusion, high mechanical stress is concentrated at the fusion ends, especially at the lumbosacral junction. There are conflicting views regarding the selection of lower instrumented vertebra in long spinal fusion for adult spinal deformity.
METHODS: This study included 53 adult patients who underwent posterior long corrective fusion (more than five levels) for their spinal kyphoscoliosis with a minimum 2 years' follow-up. The patients were divided into two groups: distal fusion level was L5, S1 (non-iliac group), or ilium (iliac group). We investigated the complication status (L5/S1 instability, pseudoarthrosis, screw loosening, sacral fracture, and rod fracture) in the lumbosacral junction.
RESULTS: There were 25 patients (L5:6 cases, S1:19 cases) in the non-iliac group and 28 in the iliac group. There was no significant deference in age and preoperative radiographic parameters between the 2 groups. In the non-iliac group, revision surgery was performed in 6 of the 25 cases (24%, LIV L5: 1 case, S: 5 cases). Lumbosacral failure was observed in 3 of 6 cases with LIV at L5 and a radiolucent sign around S1 pedicle screws were observed in 15 of 19 cases in LIV at S. In the iliac group, revision surgery was required because of rod fractures in 2 of 28 cases (7.1%). There was no other major complication in iliac group.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that a high complication rate at the lumbosacral junction was observed when the L5 or S1 was selected as the distal fusion end in long corrective fusion. On the other hand, the lumbosacral complication rate was low when using iliac screw as the lower fusion end. Thus, we recommend spinopelvic fixation using iliac screw as the lower fusion end of long corrective fusion for the adult spinal deformity surgery, with the high rate of failure in our patients with long fusions stopped at L5 and S1.
Copyright © 2016 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult spinal deformity; Long spinal fusion; Lower instrumented vertebra; Lumbosacral junction failure

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27927496     DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  16 in total

1.  [S2-Ala-iliac screws for extended pelvic fixation in longer lumbar instrumentations : Description of a freehand technique].

Authors:  F Lattig; S Weckbach
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 2.  [Complications of the lumbosacral junction in adult deformity surgery : Indications and technique for posterior and anterior revision surgery].

Authors:  A Tateen; J Bogert; H Koller; A Hempfing
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Can L5 Be Trusted During Proximal Extension of Fusion? A Case Series and a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  David Cheng; Michael Hall; Bryan Penalosa; Olumide Danisa; Wayne Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

Review 4.  S2 alar-iliac screw versus traditional iliac screw for spinopelvic fixation: a systematic review of comparative biomechanical studies.

Authors:  Takashi Hirase; Caleb Shin; Jeremiah Ling; Brian Phelps; Varan Haghshenas; Comron Saifi; Darrell S Hanson
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-28

5.  The validation study of preoperative surgical planning for corrective target in adult spinal deformity surgery with 5-year follow-up for mechanical complications.

Authors:  Shin Oe; Yu Yamato; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Go Yoshida; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Koichiro Ide; Tomohiro Yamada; Kenta Kurosu; Keiichi Nakai; Takeuchi Yuki; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-10-16       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  Bovine-derived xenograft is a viable bone graft substitute in multilevel, instrumented, spinal fusion.

Authors:  Max Prost; Jochaim Windolf; Markus Rafael Konieczny
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-25

7.  Special type of distal junctional failure exhibits pelvic incidence changes: sacroiliac joint-related pain following lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Hao-Lin Yan; Xu Jiang; Chi Zhang; Can-Chun Yang; Jiong-Lin Wu; Rui Guo; Xiao-Shuai Peng; Zhe-Yu Wang; Di Zhang; Qian-Cheng Zhao; Zi-Liang Zeng; Wen-Peng Li; Ren-Yuan Huang; Zhi-Lei Zhang; Qi-Wei Wang; Song Jin; Xu-Min Hu; Liang-Bin Gao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-06

8.  Comparison of long fusion terminating at L5 versus the sacrum in treating adult spinal deformity: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fei Jia; Guodong Wang; Xiaoyang Liu; Tao Li; Jianmin Sun
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  [Risk factors analysis of coronal imbalance after posterior long-level fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis].

Authors:  Xiaojian Niu; Sizhen Yang; Ying Zhang; Hao Qiu; Wugui Chen; Chiyu Zhou; Tongwei Chu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-04-15

10.  Minimal invasive surgical algorithm for revision lumbar spinal surgery.

Authors:  Yu Chao Lee; Robert Lee
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.