Dennis H Nielsen1, Martin Gehrchen2, Lars V Hansen2, Jonas Walbom2, Benny Dahl2. 1. Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery 2161, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: dhallager@gmail.com. 2. Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery 2161, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional assessment of inter- and intra-rater agreement. OBJECTIVES: To assess inter- and intra-rater agreement between spine surgeons with different levels of experience in a large consecutive series of adult patients referred to a tertiary institution for evaluation of a spinal deformity using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification. BACKGROUND: The development of the SRS-Schwab classification of adult spinal deformity is based on current knowledge about relevant radiographic variables related to health-related quality of life. Clinical implementation of the classification requires satisfactory reliability. Two recent reports on agreement were based on a small selected case sample using pre-marked radiographs and a large cohort of only surgical patients, including congenital deformity. METHODS: Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification of 67 consecutive adult patients referred for surgical evaluation of a spinal deformity was done in a blinded fashion without pre-marking by 2 senior spine surgeons, 1 attending, and 1 spine fellow. After 2 weeks, the classification was repeated on recoded radiographs. Inter- and intra-rater agreement was analyzed using Fleiss kappa statistics. Rater bias was assessed using Bhapkar test for marginal homogeneity. RESULTS: According to Landis and Koch, the observed agreements were considered substantial to almost perfect for curve type and sagittal modifiers and moderate for entire grade, with no consistent differences between surgeons with different levels of experience. CONCLUSIONS: The results for each individual radiographic parameter correspond to previous findings and support use of the SRS-Schwab classification in adult spinal deformity. The results for entire grade were considered only moderate. The authors recommend that it is not used as an individual parameter.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional assessment of inter- and intra-rater agreement. OBJECTIVES: To assess inter- and intra-rater agreement between spine surgeons with different levels of experience in a large consecutive series of adult patients referred to a tertiary institution for evaluation of a spinal deformity using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification. BACKGROUND: The development of the SRS-Schwab classification of adult spinal deformity is based on current knowledge about relevant radiographic variables related to health-related quality of life. Clinical implementation of the classification requires satisfactory reliability. Two recent reports on agreement were based on a small selected case sample using pre-marked radiographs and a large cohort of only surgical patients, including congenital deformity. METHODS: Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification of 67 consecutive adult patients referred for surgical evaluation of a spinal deformity was done in a blinded fashion without pre-marking by 2 senior spine surgeons, 1 attending, and 1 spine fellow. After 2 weeks, the classification was repeated on recoded radiographs. Inter- and intra-rater agreement was analyzed using Fleiss kappa statistics. Rater bias was assessed using Bhapkar test for marginal homogeneity. RESULTS: According to Landis and Koch, the observed agreements were considered substantial to almost perfect for curve type and sagittal modifiers and moderate for entire grade, with no consistent differences between surgeons with different levels of experience. CONCLUSIONS: The results for each individual radiographic parameter correspond to previous findings and support use of the SRS-Schwab classification in adult spinal deformity. The results for entire grade were considered only moderate. The authors recommend that it is not used as an individual parameter.
Authors: Kenny Yat Hong Kwan; J Naresh-Babu; Wilco Jacobs; Marinus de Kleuver; David W Polly; Caglar Yilgor; Yabin Wu; Jong-Beom Park; Manabu Ito; Miranda L van Hooff Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 4.654