Mark Driscoll1, Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong2, Hubert Labelle2, Michael Slivka3, Shawn Stad3, Stefan Parent2. 1. Spinologics, Inc., 289 Desaulniers, Quebec J4P 1M8, Canada. Electronic address: mdriscoll@spinologics.com. 2. Spinologics, Inc., 289 Desaulniers, Quebec J4P 1M8, Canada. 3. DePuy Synthes Spine, Inc., 325 Paramount Drive, Raynham, MA 02767, USA.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical finite element models simulated deformity correction using pedicle screw instrumentation and measured forces at the screw-vertebra interface. OBJECTIVES: Compare 2 different screw designs with respect to reaction forces at screw-vertebra interfaces during scoliosis correction maneuvers. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw developments strive to enhance surgical techniques and improve patient safety. It is believed that a screw with increased lateral angulation and reduction tabs enables a more gradual correction, more effectively distributes corrective forces over multiple levels, and reduces forces at screw-vertebra interfaces compared with standard polyaxial screws. METHODS: We selected 3 scoliotic patients and reconstructed their preoperative spinal profiles as finite element models using radiographic clinical measures. The osteoligamentous models were programmed and validated with mechanical properties from published literature. We used postoperative radiographs to determine instrumented levels and calibrate disc properties to corroborate simulated results with clinical data. We alternatively examined favored angle (FA) screws and polyaxial (PA) screws using correction steps characteristic to their design. We also explored sensitivity of screw forces consequent to misalignment with adjacent screws. RESULTS: Simulated postoperative spinal profiles on average adhered to clinical measures within 5°. We observed no significant differences in simulated corrective profiles between screw types (5° or less). Compared with PA screws, FA screws reduced peak pullout and lateral forces by 27% and 35%, respectively, and correspondingly reduced mean pullout and lateral forces by 48% and 40%, respectively. Changes in peak and average pullout forces resulting from screw misalignment were 56% and 82% less, respectively, with FA screws. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated reduced screw-vertebra peak and mean forces when using a pedicle screw with a favored angle bias and reduction tabs to correct scoliosis. Compared with PA screws, FA screws provide similar correction, decrease forces applied at the screw-vertebra interface, and are more forgiving if misaligned.
STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical finite element models simulated deformity correction using pedicle screw instrumentation and measured forces at the screw-vertebra interface. OBJECTIVES: Compare 2 different screw designs with respect to reaction forces at screw-vertebra interfaces during scoliosis correction maneuvers. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw developments strive to enhance surgical techniques and improve patient safety. It is believed that a screw with increased lateral angulation and reduction tabs enables a more gradual correction, more effectively distributes corrective forces over multiple levels, and reduces forces at screw-vertebra interfaces compared with standard polyaxial screws. METHODS: We selected 3 scoliotic patients and reconstructed their preoperative spinal profiles as finite element models using radiographic clinical measures. The osteoligamentous models were programmed and validated with mechanical properties from published literature. We used postoperative radiographs to determine instrumented levels and calibrate disc properties to corroborate simulated results with clinical data. We alternatively examined favored angle (FA) screws and polyaxial (PA) screws using correction steps characteristic to their design. We also explored sensitivity of screw forces consequent to misalignment with adjacent screws. RESULTS: Simulated postoperative spinal profiles on average adhered to clinical measures within 5°. We observed no significant differences in simulated corrective profiles between screw types (5° or less). Compared with PA screws, FA screws reduced peak pullout and lateral forces by 27% and 35%, respectively, and correspondingly reduced mean pullout and lateral forces by 48% and 40%, respectively. Changes in peak and average pullout forces resulting from screw misalignment were 56% and 82% less, respectively, with FA screws. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated reduced screw-vertebra peak and mean forces when using a pedicle screw with a favored angle bias and reduction tabs to correct scoliosis. Compared with PA screws, FA screws provide similar correction, decrease forces applied at the screw-vertebra interface, and are more forgiving if misaligned.
Authors: Jong Ki Shin; Beop-Yong Lim; Tae Sik Goh; Seung Min Son; Hyung-Sik Kim; Jung Sub Lee; Chi-Seung Lee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 3.240