Literature DB >> 27927378

Sagittal Cervical Alignment in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Mitsuru Yagi1, Shingo Iizuka2, Atsushi Hasegawa2, Narihito Nagoshi2, Kanehiro Fujiyoshi2, Shinjiro Kaneko2, Masakazu Takemitsu2, Masanobu Shioda2, Masafumi Machida2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series of surgically treated adolescent scoliosis patients.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the radiographic changes of cervical kyphosis and identify the possible factors affecting postoperative sagittal cervical kyphosis in surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical kyphosis is a well-recognized phenomenon in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Despite recent reports, the prevalence, radiographic changes, and possible factors affecting postoperative sagittal cervical kyphosis are controversial.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a single-center database was performed on 133 consecutive patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with long instrumented (more than 5 levels) spine fusion (minimum, 2 years; mean, 3.3 years; range, 2 to 5.5 years). A total of 89 patients met all of the inclusion criteria. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements and patient demographics were investigated.
RESULTS: Postoperative cervical kyphosis was observed in 46 patients. Cobb angle decreased from 48.1° ± 13.1° to 15.4° ± 11.1° at the final follow-up. Cervical kyphosis significantly decreased from 5.5° ± 8.9° preoperatively to -1.5° ± 8.9° at the final follow-up. No difference was observed for T2-T5, T5-T12, lumbar lordosis, sacral slope, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sagittal vertical axis during the follow-up. Notably, T2 sagittal tilt was significantly increased from preoperatively to the final follow-up. Pearson correlation coefficient test showed a strong correlation between postoperative cervical lordosis and T2 sagittal tilt (r = 0.73; p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the significant increase of cervical lordosis, 85% of patients still have a kyphotic or less lordotic cervical spine. The strong positive association between cervical lordosis and T2 sagittal tilt suggests that the sagittal cervical alignment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients is closely related to the global sagittal spine balance rather than thoracic kyphosis.
Copyright © 2014 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Cervical kyphosis; Complication

Year:  2014        PMID: 27927378     DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2013.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  5 in total

1.  Cervical sagittal alignment variations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with thoraco-lumbo-sacral orthosis.

Authors:  Marco Corradin; Federico Canavese; Alain Dimeglio; Jean Dubousset
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Difference of Sagittal Alignment between Adolescents with Symptomatic Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis and the General Population.

Authors:  Jian Zhao; Yongqiang Xiao; Xiao Zhai; Ziqiang Chen; Ming Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Cervical sagittal alignment is influenced by changes in thoracic and lumbar sagittal alignments after correction surgery in patients with lenke type 6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Toshiki Okubo; Mitsuru Yagi; Satoshi Suzuki; Yohei Takahashi; Satoshi Nori; Osahiko Tsuji; Narihito Nagoshi; Morio Matsumoto; Masaya Nakamura; Kota Watanabe
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-09-05

4.  Predictors of ultimate postoperative cervical sagittal alignment in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Zhen Liu; Zezhang Zhu; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Does spinal fusion to T2, T3, or T4 affects sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in Lenke 1 AIS patients: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Jian Zhao; Ziqiang Chen; Mingyuan Yang; Gengwu Li; Yingchuan Zhao; Ming Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.