Literature DB >> 27926575

Prophylactic Negative Pressure Dressing Use in Closed Laparotomy Wounds Following Abdominal Operations: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Trial: The P.I.C.O. Trial.

Donal Peter O'Leary1, Colin Peirce, Breffini Anglim, Michael Burton, Elizabeth Concannon, Marguerite Carter, Kevin Hickey, John Calvin Coffey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A randomized controlled trial was undertaken to investigate the effect of prophylactic negative pressure dressings on postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) rates in closed laparotomy wounds. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Laparotomy wounds are associated with high rates of SSI. The effect of prophylactic negative pressure dressing of closed incisional wounds on SSI rate is unknown.
METHODS: A randomized, controlled, open-label trial was conducted (clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT02780453). Fifty patients undergoing open abdominal surgery were included, with 25 patients randomized to the negative pressure dressing group and 25 to the standard dressing group. The primary endpoint was SSI incidence at 30 days postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included SSI incidence at 4 days, length of stay, cosmetic outcome, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis was performed on a per-protocol basis using SPSS version 23.0.
RESULTS: The incidence of SSI at 30 days postoperatively was significantly reduced in the treatment group compared with the control group [8.3% vs 32.0%, P = 0.043 (1-sided), P = 0.074 (2-sided)]. There was no difference in SSIs at 4 days postoperatively [4.1% vs 8.0%, P = 0.516 (1-sided), P = 1.0 (2-sided)]. Analysis of predictors of wound infection identified standard wound dressings as the only significant predictor of SSI development. Length of stay was significantly reduced in the negative pressure dressing group [6.1 vs 14.7 days, P = 0.019 (2-sided)]. Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction did not show any difference between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of negative pressure dressings for closed laparotomy wounds significantly reduces the incidence of SSI at 30 days postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27926575     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  25 in total

1.  Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Closed Abdominal Incisions: A Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Cameron I Wells; Chathura B B Ratnayake; Jenni Perrin; Sanjay Pandanaboyana
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions in General and Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shaheel Mohammad Sahebally; Kevin McKevitt; Ian Stephens; Fidelma Fitzpatrick; Joseph Deasy; John Patrick Burke; Deborah McNamara
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  The effect of purse-string approximation versus linear approximation of ileostomy reversal wounds on morbidity rates and patient satisfaction: the 'STOMA' trial.

Authors:  D P O'Leary; M Carter; D Wijewardene; M Burton; D Waldron; E Condon; J C Coffey; C Peirce
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  The Efficacy of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Incisions in Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David Cagney; Lydia Simmons; Donal Peter O'Leary; Mark Corrigan; Louise Kelly; M J O'Sullivan; Aaron Liew; Henry Paul Redmond
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Prophylactic negative wound therapy in laparotomy wounds (PROPEL trial): randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Noel Edward Donlon; P A Boland; M E Kelly; K Schmidt; F Cooke; P M Neary; K M Barry; J V Reynolds
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Does Vacuum-assisted Closure Reduce the Risk of Wound Complications in Patients With Lower Extremity Sarcomas Treated With Preoperative Radiation?

Authors:  Meena Bedi; David M King; John DeVries; Donald A Hackbarth; John C Neilson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Reducing Surgical Site Infection by Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in a Cohort of General Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Vladimir Piroski; Elisa Müller; Eva Herrmann; Ernst Hanisch; Alexander Buia
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2022-01-18

8.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Joan Webster; Zhenmi Liu; Gill Norman; Jo C Dumville; Laura Chiverton; Paul Scuffham; Monica Stankiewicz; Wendy P Chaboyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-26

Review 9.  Surgical site infection prevention and management in immunocompromised patients: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Mario Improta; Enrico Cicuttin; Fausto Catena; Massimo Sartelli; Raffaele Bova; Nicola De' Angelis; Stefano Gitto; Dario Tartaglia; Camilla Cremonini; Carlos Ordonez; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Massimo Chiarugi
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; En Lin Goh; Jo C Dumville; Chunhu Shi; Zhenmi Liu; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Adam Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.