Literature DB >> 27924505

Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy and devascularization for massive splenomegaly due to portal hypertension.

Yao Liu1, Long Zhao1, Yong Tang1, Yu Zhang1, Shen-Chao Shi1, Fu-Xiao Xie1, Chi-Dan Wan2.   

Abstract

Although the clinical benefit of laparoscopic splenectomy and devascularization (LSD) has been elaborated in many studies, its application in massive splenomegaly remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective research to assess the curative efficacy of LSD for massive splenomegaly due to portal hypertension. Forty-seven patients with massive splenomegaly due to portal hypertension were enrolled in this study, and divided into two groups. Twenty-one patients underwent open splenectomy and devascularization (OSD) from June 2010 to October 2012 (OSD group). From March 2013 to February 2015, LSD was performed on 26 patients (LSD group). Perioperative variables were analyzed. Compared to OSD, LSD was associated with less blood loss (241.9±110.0 mL vs. 319.0±139.5 mL, P<0.05), more rapid resumption of oral diet (2.46±0.95 days vs. 3.76±1.09 days, P<0.05), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (5.35±1.65 days vs. 7.24±1.55 days, P<0.05). It was concluded that for patients with massive splenomegaly due to portal hypertension, LSD is feasible and as safe as OSD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  devascularization; laparoscopy; massive splenomegaly; portal hypertension; splenectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27924505     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-016-1678-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  33 in total

1.  Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Arun J Sanyal; Norman D Grace; William Carey
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.425

2.  [Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach. Report of a case].

Authors:  B Delaitre; B Maignien
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1991 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 1.228

3.  Analysis of risk factors for massive intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  Masayuki Ohta; Takashi Nishizaki; Toshifumi Matsumoto; Rinshyun Shimabukuro; Atsushi Sasaki; Kohei Shibata; Toshimitsu Matsusaka; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2005

4.  Splenic hilum management during laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  Rosario Vecchio; Salvatore Marchese; Ehab Swehli; Eva Intagliata
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 1.878

5.  High-burst-strength, feedback-controlled bipolar vessel sealing.

Authors:  J S Kennedy; P L Stranahan; K D Taylor; J G Chandler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy for hematological disorders.

Authors:  Yan-Nan Bai; Hui Jiang; Pankaj Prasoon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Value of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for assessing severity of liver cirrhosis secondary to viral hepatitis.

Authors:  O Barutcu Saygili; N C Tarhan; T Yildirim; E Serin; B Ozer; A M Agildere
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  B Habermalz; S Sauerland; G Decker; B Delaitre; J-F Gigot; E Leandros; K Lechner; M Rhodes; G Silecchia; A Szold; E Targarona; P Torelli; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Comparative treatment and literature review for laparoscopic splenectomy alone versus preoperative splenic artery embolization splenectomy.

Authors:  Zhong Wu; Jin Zhou; Prasoon Pankaj; Bing Peng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Anterior versus posterolateral approach for total laparoscopic splenectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  Bai Ji; Yingchao Wang; Ping Zhang; Guangyi Wang; Yahui Liu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.