Aaron Vinik1, Andrew Bottomley2, Beata Korytowsky3, Yung-Jue Bang4, Jean-Luc Raoul5, Juan W Valle6, Peter Metrakos7, Dieter Hörsch8, Rajiv Mundayat3, Arlene Reisman3, Zhixiao Wang3, Richard C Chao9, Eric Raymond10. 1. Strelitz Diabetes Research Center and Neuroendocrine Unit, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Strelitz Diabetes Center, Norfolk, VA, USA. vinikai@evms.edu. 2. Quality of Life Department, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium. 3. Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA. 4. Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 5. Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France. 6. The University of Manchester/The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. 7. McGill University Hospital Center, Montreal, Canada. 8. Bad Berka Central Clinic, Bad Berka, Germany. 9. Pfizer Oncology, La Jolla, CA, USA. 10. Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to compare patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a pivotal phase III trial of sunitinib versus placebo in patients with progressive, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NCT00428597). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received sunitinib 37.5 mg (n = 86) or placebo (n = 85) on a continuous daily-dosing schedule until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events (AEs), or death. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 at baseline, Day 1 of every 4-week cycle, and end of treatment or withdrawal. Changes ≥10 points on each scale or item were deemed clinically meaningful. RESULTS: Sunitinib had anti-tumor effects and improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo. The study was terminated early for this reason and because of more serious AEs and deaths with placebo. Baseline HRQoL scores were well balanced between study arms, and were generally maintained over time in both groups. In the first 10 cycles, there were no significant differences between groups in global HRQoL, cognitive, emotional, physical, role, and social functioning domains, or symptom scales, except for worsening diarrhea with sunitinib (p < 0.0001 vs. placebo). Insomnia also worsened with sunitinib (p = 0.0372 vs. placebo), but the difference was not clinically meaningful. CONCLUSION: With the exception of diarrhea (a recognized side effect), sunitinib had no impact on global HRQoL, functional domains, or symptom scales during the progression-free period. Hence, in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, sunitinib provided a benefit in PFS without adversely affecting HRQoL.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to compare patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a pivotal phase III trial of sunitinib versus placebo in patients with progressive, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NCT00428597). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received sunitinib 37.5 mg (n = 86) or placebo (n = 85) on a continuous daily-dosing schedule until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events (AEs), or death. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 at baseline, Day 1 of every 4-week cycle, and end of treatment or withdrawal. Changes ≥10 points on each scale or item were deemed clinically meaningful. RESULTS:Sunitinib had anti-tumor effects and improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo. The study was terminated early for this reason and because of more serious AEs and deaths with placebo. Baseline HRQoL scores were well balanced between study arms, and were generally maintained over time in both groups. In the first 10 cycles, there were no significant differences between groups in global HRQoL, cognitive, emotional, physical, role, and social functioning domains, or symptom scales, except for worsening diarrhea with sunitinib (p < 0.0001 vs. placebo). Insomnia also worsened with sunitinib (p = 0.0372 vs. placebo), but the difference was not clinically meaningful. CONCLUSION: With the exception of diarrhea (a recognized side effect), sunitinib had no impact on global HRQoL, functional domains, or symptom scales during the progression-free period. Hence, in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, sunitinib provided a benefit in PFS without adversely affecting HRQoL.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: G Rindi; M Falconi; C Klersy; L Albarello; L Boninsegna; M W Buchler; C Capella; M Caplin; A Couvelard; C Doglioni; G Delle Fave; L Fischer; G Fusai; W W de Herder; H Jann; P Komminoth; R R de Krijger; S La Rosa; T V Luong; U Pape; A Perren; P Ruszniewski; A Scarpa; A Schmitt; E Solcia; B Wiedenmann Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-04-23 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Eric Raymond; Laetitia Dahan; Jean-Luc Raoul; Yung-Jue Bang; Ivan Borbath; Catherine Lombard-Bohas; Juan Valle; Peter Metrakos; Denis Smith; Aaron Vinik; Jen-Shi Chen; Dieter Hörsch; Pascal Hammel; Bertram Wiedenmann; Eric Van Cutsem; Shem Patyna; Dongrui Ray Lu; Carolyn Blanckmeister; Richard Chao; Philippe Ruszniewski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew H Kulke; Johanna Bendell; Larry Kvols; Joel Picus; Rodney Pommier; James Yao Journal: J Hematol Oncol Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 17.388
Authors: James C Yao; Milton P Eisner; Colleen Leary; Cecile Dagohoy; Alexandria Phan; Asif Rashid; Manal Hassan; Douglas B Evans Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-09-26 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: E Charton; B Cuer; F Cottone; F Efficace; C Touraine; Z Hamidou; F Fiteni; F Bonnetain; M-C Woronoff-Lemsi; C Bascoul-Mollevi; A Anota Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Elsa M Ronde; Charlotte M Heidsma; Anne M Eskes; Josefine E Schopman; Elisabeth J M Nieveen van Dijkum Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 2.328
Authors: Martin A Walter; Cédric Nesti; Marko Spanjol; Attila Kollár; Lukas Bütikofer; Viktoria L Gloy; Rebecca A Dumont; Christian A Seiler; Emanuel R Christ; Piotr Radojewski; Matthias Briel; Reto M Kaderli Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-11-25
Authors: Jessica E Pritchard; Lauren E Wilson; Samuel M Miller; Melissa A Greiner; Harvey Jay Cohen; Deborah R Kaye; Tian Zhang; Michaela A Dinan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Reto M Kaderli; Marko Spanjol; Attila Kollár; Lukas Bütikofer; Viktoria Gloy; Rebecca A Dumont; Christian A Seiler; Emanuel R Christ; Piotr Radojewski; Matthias Briel; Martin A Walter Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Enrique Grande; Cristina Rodriguez-Antona; Carlos López; Teresa Alonso-Gordoa; Marta Benavent; Jaume Capdevila; Alex Teulé; Ana Custodio; Isabel Sevilla; Jorge Hernando; Pablo Gajate; Javier Molina-Cerrillo; Juan José Díez; María Santos; Javier Lanillos; Rocío García-Carbonero Journal: Oncologist Date: 2021-07-14
Authors: Catherine Watson; Craig William Tallentire; John K Ramage; Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan; Oscar R Leeuwenkamp; Donna Fountain Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 5.742