Literature DB >> 27924417

Surgical resection of skull-base chordomas: experience in case selection for surgical approach according to anatomical compartments and review of the literature.

Nir Shimony1, Lior Gonen1, Ben Shofty1, Avraham Abergel2, Dan M Fliss2, Nevo Margalit3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chordoma is a rare bony malignancy known to have a high rate of local recurrence after surgery. The best treatment paradigm is still being evaluated. We report our experience and review the literature. We emphasize on the difference between endoscopic and open craniotomy in regard to the anatomical compartment harboring the tumor, the limitations of the approaches and the rate of surgical resection.
METHOD: We retrospectively collected all patients with skull-base chordomas operated on between 2004 and 2014. Detailed radiological description of the compartments being occupied by the tumor and the degree of surgical resection is discussed.
RESULTS: Eighteen patients were operated on in our facility for skull-base chordoma. Seventeen endoscopic surgeries were done in 15 patients, and 7 craniotomies were done in 5 patients. The mean age was 48.9 years (±19.8 years). When reviewing the anatomical compartments, we found that the most common were the upper clivus (95.6%) and lower clivus (58.3%), left cavernous sinus (66.7%) and petrous apex (∼60%). Most of the patients had intradural tumor involvement (70.8%). In all craniotomy cases, there was residual tumor in multiple compartments. In the endoscopic cases, the most difficult compartments for total resection were the lower clivus, and lateral extensions to the petrous apex or cavernous sinus.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that the endoscopic approach is a good option for midline tumors without significant lateral extension. In cases with very lateral or lower extensions, additional approaches should be added trying to achieve complete resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chordoma; Clivus; Endoscopy; MRI; Skull base

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27924417     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-016-3032-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  5 in total

1.  Systematic Review Comparing Open versus Endoscopic Surgery in Clival Chordomas and a 10-Year Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Asfand Baig Mirza; Visagan Ravindran; Mohamed Okasha; Timothy Martyn Boardman; Eleni Maratos; Barazi Sinan; Nick Thomas
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-02-22

2.  Endoscopic endonasal transclival removal of tumors of the clivus and anterior region of the posterior cranial fossa (results of surgical treatment of 140 patients).

Authors:  Alexey N Shkarubo; Konstantin V Koval; Ilia V Chernov; Dmitry N Andreev; Alexey B Kurnosov; Andrey A Panteleyev
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2018-11-15

3.  Application of endoscopic endonasal approach in skull base surgeries: summary of 1886 cases in a single center for 10 consecutive years.

Authors:  Chuzhong Li; Haibo Zhu; Xuyi Zong; Xinsheng Wang; Songbai Gui; Peng Zhao; Chunhui Liu; Jiwei Bai; Lei Cao; Yazhuo Zhang
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2020-06-04

4.  Clival chordoma in a young male patient: a case report.

Authors:  Aref Zribi; Sonia Ben Nasr; Aya Khemir; Faten Gargouri; Ichrak Ben Abdallah; Issam Msakni; Sana Fendri; Mehdi Balti; Basma Laabidi; Abderrazek Haddaoui
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-09-15

5.  Craniovertebral junction chordomas: Case series and strategies to overcome the surgical challenge.

Authors:  Bianca Maria Baldassarre; Giuseppe Di Perna; Irene Portonero; Federica Penner; Fabio Cofano; Raffaele De Marco; Nicola Marengo; Diego Garbossa; Giancarlo Pecorari; Francesco Zenga
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2021-12-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.