Literature DB >> 27923627

Outcomes of cementless unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Jelle P van der List1, Dana L Sheng2, Laura J Kleeblad3, Harshvardhan Chawla4, Andrew D Pearle5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening is a common failure mode in cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This led to the development of cementless designs but the historical outcomes were poor. Recent developments in cementless designs have improved outcomes, but the current status is unknown. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to assess recent outcomes of cementless knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: A search was performed using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane systems and national registries for studies reporting outcomes since 2005. Fifty-two cohort studies and four registries reported survivorship, failure modes or functional outcomes of cementless UKA and TKA.
RESULTS: Nine level I studies, six level II studies, three level III studies, 34 level IV studies and four registries were included. Three hundred eighteen failures in 10,309 cementless TKA procedures and 62 failures in 2218 cementless UKA procedures resulted in extrapolated five-year, 10-year and 15-year survivorship of cementless TKAs of 97.7%, 95.4% and 93.0%, respectively, and cementless UKA of 96.4%, 92.9% and 89.3%, respectively. Aseptic loosening was more common in cementless TKA (25%) when compared to UKA (13%). Functional outcomes of cementless TKA and UKA were excellent with 84.3% and 84.5% of the maximum possible scores, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review showed that good to excellent extrapolated survivorship and functional outcomes are seen following modern cementless UKA and TKA, with a low incidence of aseptic loosening following cementless UKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cementless; TKA; Total knee arthroplasty; UKA; Uncemented; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27923627     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  13 in total

Review 1.  Component Placement Accuracy in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Improved with Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Will It Have an Effect on Outcomes?

Authors:  Ryan C Rauck; Jason L Blevins; Michael B Cross
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2017-12-11

Review 2.  Highlighting the advantages and benefits of cementless total knee arthroplasty (Review).

Authors:  Bogdan Uivaraseanu; Cosmin Mihai Vesa; Delia Mirela Tit; Octavian Maghiar; Teodor Andrei Maghiar; Calin Hozan; Aurelia Cristina Nechifor; Tapan Behl; Felicia Liana Andronie-Cioara; Jenel Marian Patrascu; Simona Bungau
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Impact of keel saw blade design and thickness on the incidence of tibial plateau fracture and tibial implant-loosening in cementless medial UKR.

Authors:  Lena Keppler; Steffen Klingbeil; Alexander Martin Keppler; Johannes Becker; Christian Fulghum; Björn Michel; Kilian Voigts; Wolfgang Reng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  Application of different patella height indices in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bin Xu; Wei-Xing Xu; Di Lu; Hong-Feng Sheng; Xin-Wei Xu; Wei-Guo Ding
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Jonathan T Evans; Robert W Walker; Jonathan P Evans; Ashley W Blom; Adrian Sayers; Michael R Whitehouse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannah A Wilson; Rob Middleton; Simon G F Abram; Stephanie Smith; Abtin Alvand; William F Jackson; Nicholas Bottomley; Sally Hopewell; Andrew J Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-02-21

7.  Cementless Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement-Clinical and Radiological Results of 228 Knees with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Benjamin Panzram; Mira Mandery; Tobias Reiner; Tobias Gotterbarm; Marcus Schiltenwolf; Christian Merle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Observational Study of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Aseptic Revision Surgery: Clinical Results.

Authors:  Gabriel Oliver; Luis Jaldin; Eric Camprubí; Guillermo Cortés
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.071

9.  CORR Insights®: Bearing Dislocation and Progression of Osteoarthritis After Mobile-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Vary Between Asian and Western Patients: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications, technical issues and results.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán; Primitivo Gómez-Cardero
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.