Literature DB >> 27923626

Limitations in predicting outcome following primary ACL reconstruction with single-bundle hamstring autograft - A systematic review.

Vincent Vg An1, Corey Scholes2, Vikram A Mhaskar2, William J Hadden3, David Parker2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the most well studied and performed procedures in the world. Thus, it would be useful to develop a tool to predict patient outcomes post-operatively to allow clinicians to optimise management.
PURPOSE: To identify and summarise factors predictive of graft failure and patient-reported outcome (PROM) measures at minimum two years after ACLR with single-bundle quadruple hamstring autograft via the anteromedial portal technique.
METHODS: Studies reporting IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm and graft failure in ACLR were systematically reviewed. A methodological score was applied to these studies, with those above the mean analysed further. Only those reporting primary predictors of patient outcomes following ACLR were included.
RESULTS: Twenty-six studies satisfied our inclusion criteria. Fourteen scored above the mean 20 Downs and Black score (18.4) and were considered higher level evidence. The higher quality papers reported that younger age, female sex, higher BMI, smoking history and activity levels predicted poorer outcomes. High-grade tears of the menisci or full-thickness cartilage defects were identified as predictors of poorer PROMs. None of the factors investigated by more than a single paper were unanimously significant in predicting the outcome of ACLR.
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence surrounding predictors of outcome was inconsistent in design, methodology and reporting of results, hindering our ability to draw conclusions regarding the validity of the reported relationships. However, this systematic review identified several patient demographics, concomitant injuries, and surgical factors that could be investigated further in future prospective studies to create a definitive predictive model.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Knee; Patient-reported outcome; Predictors; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27923626     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  4 in total

1.  Preoperative KOOS and SF-36 Scores Are Associated With the Development of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis at 7 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  J Kristopher Ware; Brett D Owens; Matthew R Akelman; Naga Padmini Karamchedu; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Gary J Badger; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  While modern medicine evolves continuously, evidence-based research methodology remains: how register studies should be interpreted and appreciated.

Authors:  Eleonor Svantesson; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Kurt P Spindler; Olufemi R Ayeni; Freddie H Fu; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Prognostic Factors for Patient-Reported Outcomes at 32 to 37 Years After Surgical or Nonsurgical Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Stephanie Filbay; Christer Andersson; Håkan Gauffin; Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-08-11

4.  Meniscus or Cartilage Injury at the Time of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Is Associated With Worse Prognosis for Patient-Reported Outcome 2 to 10 Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marie Pedersen; Jessica L Johnson; Hege Grindem; Karin Magnusson; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.751

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.