Literature DB >> 27923481

Regulation of step frequency in transtibial amputee endurance athletes using a running-specific prosthesis.

Laura M Oudenhoven1, Judith M Boes2, Laura Hak3, Gert S Faber2, Han Houdijk4.   

Abstract

Running specific prostheses (RSP) are designed to replicate the spring-like behaviour of the human leg during running, by incorporating a real physical spring in the prosthesis. Leg stiffness is an important parameter in running as it is strongly related to step frequency and running economy. To be able to select a prosthesis that contributes to the required leg stiffness of the athlete, it needs to be known to what extent the behaviour of the prosthetic leg during running is dominated by the stiffness of the prosthesis or whether it can be regulated by adaptations of the residual joints. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how athletes with an RSP could regulate leg stiffness during distance running at different step frequencies. Seven endurance runners with an unilateral transtibial amputation performed five running trials on a treadmill at a fixed speed, while different step frequencies were imposed (preferred step frequency (PSF) and -15%, -7.5%, +7.5% and +15% of PSF). Among others, step time, ground contact time, flight time, leg stiffness and joint kinetics were measured for both legs. In the intact leg, increasing step frequency was accompanied by a decrease in both contact and flight time, while in the prosthetic leg contact time remained constant and only flight time decreased. In accordance, leg stiffness increased in the intact leg, but not in the prosthetic leg. Although a substantial contribution of the residual leg to total leg stiffness was observed, this contribution did not change considerably with changing step frequency. Amputee athletes do not seem to be able to alter prosthetic leg stiffness to regulate step frequency during running. This invariant behaviour indicates that RSP stiffness has a large effect on total leg stiffness and therefore can have an important influence on running performance. Nevertheless, since prosthetic leg stiffness was considerably lower than stiffness of the RSP, compliance of the residual leg should not be ignored when selecting RSP stiffness.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leg stiffness; Lower limb prosthesis; Natural frequency; Running; Spring-mass model

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27923481     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

1.  How do prosthetic stiffness, height and running speed affect the biomechanics of athletes with bilateral transtibial amputations?

Authors:  Owen N Beck; Paolo Taboga; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  The Effect of Prosthetic Alignment on Prosthetic and Total Leg Stiffness While Running With Simulated Running-Specific Prostheses.

Authors:  Ashley Groothuis; Han Houdijk
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2019-08-22

3.  Effects of step frequency during running on the magnitude and symmetry of ground reaction forces in individuals with a transfemoral amputation.

Authors:  Toshiki Kobayashi; Mark W P Koh; Mingyu Hu; Hiroto Murata; Genki Hisano; Daisuke Ichimura; Hiroaki Hobara
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.