Literature DB >> 27923228

Feasibility and Acceptability of Anal Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Screening in HIV-Infected Patients.

Catherine Tamalet1, Isabelle Ravaux, Catherine Dhiver, Amelie Menard, Philippe Colson, Andreas Stein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Anal cancer incidence is increasing among HIV-positive patients. No consensus currently exists for the screening of anal dysplasia. This study aimed at evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of anal self-sampling and assessing the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) types among HIV-positive patients from Marseille University Hospitals.
METHODS: Between October 2013 and March 2014, during their regular visits for the monitoring of their HIV infection in an HIV outpatient clinical unit of Marseille University Hospitals, patients were asked to self-sample anal swabs for HPV detection. A specimen self-collection kit was provided. HPV detection and genotyping were performed using in-house protocols. The quality of self-sampling was assessed by concurrent cellular quantification in collected samples.
RESULTS: The acceptability rate of anal self-sampling was 91%, and 91% of the self-sampled specimens were appropriate for HPV screening. In addition, 76% of the samples were positive for HPV, including 54% of HPV types with oncogenic potential.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that HPV detection and typing through anal self-sampling is a valuable strategy to screen patients at high risk for anal cancer development. This could allow earlier management of anal lesions and related cancer in patients at high risk for HPV.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27923228     DOI: 10.1159/000452710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intervirology        ISSN: 0300-5526            Impact factor:   1.763


  5 in total

1.  Gay and Bisexual Men Who Report Anal Sex Stigma Alongside Discomfort Discussing Anal Sex with Health Workers Are Less Likely to Have Ever Received an Anal Examination or Anal Swab.

Authors:  Bryan A Kutner; Jane M Simoni; Will DeWitt; Michael M Gaisa; Theodorus G M Sandfort
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Acceptability of anal cancer screening tests for women living with HIV in the EVVA study.

Authors:  E Kaufman; C de Castro; T Williamson; B Lessard; M Munoz; M H Mayrand; A N Burchell; M B Klein; L Charest; M Auger; V Marcus; F Coutlée; A de Pokomandy
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Comparison of anal cancer screening strategies including standard anoscopy, anal cytology, and HPV genotyping in HIV-positive men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Simon Pernot; Pauline Boucheron; Hélène Péré; Marie-Laure Lucas; David Veyer; Nadia Fathallah; Vincent de Parades; Juliette Pavie; Jeanne Netter; Lio Collias; Julien Taieb; Sophie Grabar; Laurence Weiss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Ambulatory anal self-sampling in MSM living with HIV, an acceptable and reliable screening method.

Authors:  Benoît Heid-Picard; Béatrix Cochand-Priollet; Flore Rozenberg; David Giang-Phang; Jean-Paul Viard; Valentina La Torre; Jade Ghosn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Acceptability of innovative culture-based antibiotic prophylaxis strategies: a multi-method study on experiences regarding transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Sofie C M Tops; Anita M P Huis; Willeke Trompers; Anke J M Oerlemans; J P Michiel Sedelaar; Eva Kolwijck; Heiman F L Wertheim; Marlies E J L Hulscher
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2021-11-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.