Cecilia Lundin1, Kristina Gemzell Danielsson2, Marie Bixo3, Lena Moby1, Hanna Bengtsdotter4, Izabella Jawad4, Lena Marions5, Jan Brynhildsen6, Agota Malmborg6, Ingela Lindh7, Inger Sundström Poromaa8. 1. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 2. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Clinical Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden. 5. Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. 8. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Electronic address: inger.sundstrom@kbh.uu.se.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Ever since the introduction of combined oral contraception (COC), one of the major reasons for discontinuing the pill use has been mood-related side effects. Moreover, women who discontinue the pill turn to less effective methods whereby the probability of an unintended conception increases. Approximately 4-10% of COC users complain of depressed mood, irritability or increased anxiety, but drug-related causality has been difficult to prove. Given the lack of randomized controlled trials in this area, we aimed to prospectively estimate the severity of adverse mood in COC users that would be as representative of general users as possible. METHODS: This investigator-initiated, multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study included 202 healthy women. Women were randomized to a COC (1.5mg estradiol and 2.5mg nomegestrolacetate) or placebo for three treatment cycles. Main outcome measure was the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP), which was filled out daily during one baseline cycle and the final treatment cycle. RESULTS: Results from 84 women in the COC group and 94 women in theplacebo group were analysed. COC use was associated with small, but statistically significant, increases in mean anxiety (0.22; 95% CI: 0.07-0.37, p=0.003), irritability (0.23; 95% CI: 0.07-0.38, p=0.012), and mood swings scores (0.15; 95% CI: 0.00-0.31, p=0.047) during the intermenstrual phase, but a significant premenstrual improvement in depression (-0.33; 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.05, p=0.049). Secondary analyses showed that women with previous adverse hormonal contraceptive experience reported significantly greater mood worsening in the intermenstrual phase in comparison with healthy women, p<0.05. The proportion of women who reported a clinically relevant mood deterioration did not differ between those allocated to COC (24.1%) or placebo (17.0%), p=0.262. CONCLUSION:COC use is associated with small but statistically significant mood side effects in the intermenstrual phase. These findings are driven by a subgroup of women who clearly suffer from COC-related side effects. However, positive mood effects are noted in the premenstrual phase and the proportion of women with clinically relevant mood worsening did not differ between treatment groups.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Ever since the introduction of combined oral contraception (COC), one of the major reasons for discontinuing the pill use has been mood-related side effects. Moreover, women who discontinue the pill turn to less effective methods whereby the probability of an unintended conception increases. Approximately 4-10% of COC users complain of depressed mood, irritability or increased anxiety, but drug-related causality has been difficult to prove. Given the lack of randomized controlled trials in this area, we aimed to prospectively estimate the severity of adverse mood in COC users that would be as representative of general users as possible. METHODS: This investigator-initiated, multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study included 202 healthy women. Women were randomized to a COC (1.5mg estradiol and 2.5mg nomegestrolacetate) or placebo for three treatment cycles. Main outcome measure was the Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP), which was filled out daily during one baseline cycle and the final treatment cycle. RESULTS: Results from 84 women in the COC group and 94 women in the placebo group were analysed. COC use was associated with small, but statistically significant, increases in mean anxiety (0.22; 95% CI: 0.07-0.37, p=0.003), irritability (0.23; 95% CI: 0.07-0.38, p=0.012), and mood swings scores (0.15; 95% CI: 0.00-0.31, p=0.047) during the intermenstrual phase, but a significant premenstrual improvement in depression (-0.33; 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.05, p=0.049). Secondary analyses showed that women with previous adverse hormonal contraceptive experience reported significantly greater mood worsening in the intermenstrual phase in comparison with healthy women, p<0.05. The proportion of women who reported a clinically relevant mood deterioration did not differ between those allocated to COC (24.1%) or placebo (17.0%), p=0.262. CONCLUSION: COC use is associated with small but statistically significant mood side effects in the intermenstrual phase. These findings are driven by a subgroup of women who clearly suffer from COC-related side effects. However, positive mood effects are noted in the premenstrual phase and the proportion of women with clinically relevant mood worsening did not differ between treatment groups.
Authors: Tory A Eisenlohr-Moul; Susan S Girdler; Jacqueline L Johnson; Peter J Schmidt; David R Rubinow Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Regine Sitruk-Ware; Mitchell D Creinin; Michael Thomas; Kurt T Barnhart; George Creasy; Heather Sussman; Mohcine Alami; Anne E Burke; Edith Weisberg; Ian Fraser; Marie-José Miranda; Melissa Gilliam; James Liu; Bruce R Carr; Marlena Plagianos; Kevin Roberts; Diana Blithe Journal: Contraception Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 3.375
Authors: Alicia M Allen; Andrea H Weinberger; Reagan R Wetherill; Carol L Howe; Sherry A McKee Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Anouk E de Wit; Sanne H Booij; Erik J Giltay; Hadine Joffe; Robert A Schoevers; Albertine J Oldehinkel Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Jennifer B Dwyer; Awais Aftab; Rajiv Radhakrishnan; Alik Widge; Carolyn I Rodriguez; Linda L Carpenter; Charles B Nemeroff; William M McDonald; Ned H Kalin Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Angela C Weyand; Kate D Fitzgerald; Mary McGrath; Vibhuti Gupta; Thomas M Braun; Elisabeth H Quint; Sung W Choi Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2021-09-10 Impact factor: 6.314
Authors: Anne Marieke Doornweerd; Susan Branje; Stefanie A Nelemans; Wim H J Meeus; Estrella R Montoya; Iris M Engelhard; Joke M P Baas; Lotte Gerritsen Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 5.435