BACKGROUND: Caregiving for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (Allo-HSCT) patients can be significantly burdensome. Caregiver well-being often mirrors patients' suffering. However, to our knowledge, this dyadic relationship has not been linked to patient outcome. OBJECTIVE: Caregiver's objective and subjective sleep and overall distress before transplantation were hypothesized to be related to patient's time to engraftment in secondary analyses. METHODS: Dyads (N = 124) were Allo-HSCT patients (mean [SD] age, 49.2 [12.7] years) and their caregivers (mean [SD] age, 52.7 [12.3] years). Caregiver's subjective sleep quality was measured via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, objective sleep was measured by actigraphy, and distress was measured by combining validated psychological measures. RESULTS: Both caregiver reports of worse sleep (β = .22; P < .05) and objective measurement of caregiver sleep patterns (higher sleep efficiency; less time awake after sleep onset) collected before engraftment significantly predicted shorter time to patient engraftment (β values = -.34 and .29, respectively; P values < .05). Caregiver distress was unrelated to engraftment (β = .14; P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations in available patient data, these findings appear to link caregiver well-being to patient outcome. This underscores the interrelatedness of the patient-caregiver dyad in Allo-HSCT. Future research should examine psychological and biomedical mediators. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Given that caregiver well-being during the peritransplantation period was associated with patient outcome in this study, such findings highlight the need to address caregiver and patient well-being during Allo-HSCT. There may be potential to improve patient outcome by focusing on the caregiver, which nursing staff is well positioned to monitor.
BACKGROUND: Caregiving for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (Allo-HSCT) patients can be significantly burdensome. Caregiver well-being often mirrors patients' suffering. However, to our knowledge, this dyadic relationship has not been linked to patient outcome. OBJECTIVE: Caregiver's objective and subjective sleep and overall distress before transplantation were hypothesized to be related to patient's time to engraftment in secondary analyses. METHODS: Dyads (N = 124) were Allo-HSCT patients (mean [SD] age, 49.2 [12.7] years) and their caregivers (mean [SD] age, 52.7 [12.3] years). Caregiver's subjective sleep quality was measured via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, objective sleep was measured by actigraphy, and distress was measured by combining validated psychological measures. RESULTS: Both caregiver reports of worse sleep (β = .22; P < .05) and objective measurement of caregiver sleep patterns (higher sleep efficiency; less time awake after sleep onset) collected before engraftment significantly predicted shorter time to patient engraftment (β values = -.34 and .29, respectively; P values < .05). Caregiver distress was unrelated to engraftment (β = .14; P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations in available patient data, these findings appear to link caregiver well-being to patient outcome. This underscores the interrelatedness of the patient-caregiver dyad in Allo-HSCT. Future research should examine psychological and biomedical mediators. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Given that caregiver well-being during the peritransplantation period was associated with patient outcome in this study, such findings highlight the need to address caregiver and patient well-being during Allo-HSCT. There may be potential to improve patient outcome by focusing on the caregiver, which nursing staff is well positioned to monitor.
Authors: Sara Carney; Theresa Koetters; Maria Cho; Claudia West; Steven M Paul; Laura Dunn; Bradley E Aouizerat; Marylin Dodd; Bruce Cooper; Kathryn Lee; William Wara; Patrick Swift; Christine Miaskowski Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Cynthia M Castro; Kathryn A Lee; Donald L Bliwise; Guido G Urizar; Steven H Woodward; Abby C King Journal: Behav Sleep Med Date: 2009 Impact factor: 2.964
Authors: S M Davies; C Kollman; C Anasetti; J H Antin; J Gajewski; J T Casper; A Nademanee; H Noreen; R King; D Confer; N A Kernan Journal: Blood Date: 2000-12-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Kara Zivin Bambauer; Baohui Zhang; Paul K Maciejewski; Neayka Sahay; William F Pirl; Susan D Block; Holly G Prigerson Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2006-07-24 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Jennifer M Knight; Jeffrey M Lyness; Olle Jane Z Sahler; Jane L Liesveld; Jan A Moynihan Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Jennifer R Piazza; Natalia O Dmitrieva; Susan T Charles; David M Almeida; Gabriel A Orona Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Rebecca Robbins; Matthew D Weaver; Stuart F Quan; Laura K Barger; Stephany Zhivotovsky; Charles A Czeisler Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Scott G Ravyts; Timothy S Sannes; Joseph M Dzierzewski; Eric S Zhou; Benjamin W Brewer; Crystal Natvig; Mark L Laudenslager Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2021-03-31 Impact factor: 3.955
Authors: Timothy S Sannes; Krista W Ranby; Miryam Yusufov; Benjamin W Brewer; Jamie M Jacobs; Stephanie Callan; Gillian R Ulrich; Nicole A Pensak; Crystal Natvig; Mark L Laudenslager Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 3.186