Literature DB >> 2792220

The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority.

P H Brook, W C Shaw.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reproducible index of orthodontic treatment priority. After reviewing the available literature, it was felt that this could be best achieved by using two separate components to record firstly the dental health and functional indications for treatment, and secondly the aesthetic impairment caused by the malocclusion. A modification of the index used by the Swedish Dental Health Board was used to record the need for orthodontic treatment on dental health and functional grounds. This index was modified by defining five grades, with precise dividing lines between each grade. An illustrated 10-point scale was used to assess independently the aesthetic treatment need of the patients. This scale was constructed using dental photographs of 12-year-olds collected during a large multi-disciplinary survey. Six non-dental judges rated these photographs on a visual analogue scale, and at equal intervals along the judged range, representative photographs were chosen. To test the index in use, two sample populations were defined; a group of patients referred for treatment, and a random sample of 11-12-year-old schoolchildren. Both samples were examined using the index and satisfactory levels of intra- and inter-examiner agreement were obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2792220     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  180 in total

1.  Retrospective evaluation of the outcome of orthodontic treatment in adults.

Authors:  T Riedmann; R Berg
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 2.  ABC or oral health. Improving occlusion and orofacial aesthetics: orthodontics.

Authors:  S Cunningham; E Horrocks; N Hunt; S Jones; H Moseley; J Noar; C Scully
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-29

3.  The psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire--translation and cross-cultural validation in Croatia.

Authors:  Stjepan Spalj; Vlatka Lajnert; Luida Ivankovic
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ciara Campbell; Declan Millett; Niamh Kelly; Marie Cooke; Michael Cronin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  [Effect of body image in adolescent orthodontic treatment].

Authors:  Peng Minghui; Kang Jing; Deng Xiao
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017-10-01

6.  Effect of personality on oral health-related quality of life in undergraduates.

Authors:  Feiou Lin; Yanling Ye; Shengjia Ye; Lan Wang; Wulong Du; Linjie Yao; Jing Guo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Evaluation of orthodontic treatment success in patients with pronounced Angle Class III.

Authors:  R Angermann; R Berg
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Use and knowledge of IOTN among GDPs in Scotland.

Authors:  A Puri; J Ho-A-Yun; N J McGuinness
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  Who needs orthodontic treatment? Who gets it? And who wants it?

Authors:  Z Jawad; C Bates; T Hodge
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  Measuring orthodontic treatment satisfaction: questionnaire development and preliminary validation.

Authors:  M E Bennett; J F Tulloch; K W Vig; C L Phillips
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.