INTRODUCTION: Histone deacetylases (HDAC) are considered as promising targets for cancer treatment. Today, four HDAC inhibitors, vorinostat, romidepsin, belinostat, and panobinostat, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for cancer treatment, while others are in clinical trials. Among them, several are naturally occurring fungal metabolites. OBJECTIVE: To develop and optimise an enzyme assay for bio-guided identification of HDAC inhibitors in fungal strains. METHODS: Fluorescence and MS-based HDAC enzymatic assays were compared during the bio-guided fractionation of Penicillium griseofulvum. The MS-based approach was then optimised to evaluate HDAC selectivity using the human recombinant class I isoform HDAC1 and the class II isoform HDAC6. RESULTS: Fluorescence-based assays have several drawbacks when used for bio-guided fractionation because of the native fluorescence and the trypsin inhibitory ability of compounds present in many extracts. The MS-based method led to the isolation of gliocladride C, which is selective for HDAC1 and salirepol, which showed an HDAC6 selectivity. Their activity and presence in P. griseofulvum is described here for the first time. CONCLUSION: The UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS-based method using specific HDAC isoforms is suitable to isolate selective HDAC inhibitors by bio-guided fractionation of fungal strains. Also, it decreases potential interferences with natural products compared to the fluorescence-based assay.
INTRODUCTION: Histone deacetylases (HDAC) are considered as promising targets for cancer treatment. Today, four HDAC inhibitors, vorinostat, romidepsin, belinostat, and panobinostat, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for cancer treatment, while others are in clinical trials. Among them, several are naturally occurring fungal metabolites. OBJECTIVE: To develop and optimise an enzyme assay for bio-guided identification of HDAC inhibitors in fungal strains. METHODS: Fluorescence and MS-based HDAC enzymatic assays were compared during the bio-guided fractionation of Penicillium griseofulvum. The MS-based approach was then optimised to evaluate HDAC selectivity using the human recombinant class I isoform HDAC1 and the class II isoform HDAC6. RESULTS: Fluorescence-based assays have several drawbacks when used for bio-guided fractionation because of the native fluorescence and the trypsin inhibitory ability of compounds present in many extracts. The MS-based method led to the isolation of gliocladride C, which is selective for HDAC1 and salirepol, which showed an HDAC6 selectivity. Their activity and presence in P. griseofulvum is described here for the first time. CONCLUSION: The UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS-based method using specific HDAC isoforms is suitable to isolate selective HDAC inhibitors by bio-guided fractionation of fungal strains. Also, it decreases potential interferences with natural products compared to the fluorescence-based assay.