Literature DB >> 27921322

The heterophoria of 3-5 year old children as a function of viewing distance and target type.

Mary E Troyer1, Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan1, T J Peper1, T Rowan Candy1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Heterophoria is the misalignment of the eyes in monocular viewing and represents the accuracy of vergence driven by all classical cues except disparity. It is challenging to assess restless children using clinical cover tests, and phoria in early childhood is poorly understood. Here we used eye tracking to assess phoria as a function of viewing distance and target in adults and young children, with comparison to clinical cover tests.
METHODS: Purkinje image tracking (MCS PowerRefractor) was used to record eye alignment in adults (19-28 years, N = 24) and typically developing children (3-5 years, N = 24). Objective unilateral and alternating cover tests were performed using an infrared filter while participants viewed a pseudo-randomised sequence of Lea symbols (0.18 logMAR; Snellen: 20/30 or 6/9) and animated cartoon movies at distances of 40 cm, 1 m, and 6 m. For the unilateral cover test, a 10 s binocular period preceded and followed 30 s of occlusion of the right eye. For the alternating cover test, a 10 s binocular period preceded and followed alternate covering of right and left eyes for 3-s each. Phoria was derived from the difference in weighted average binocular and monocular alignment. A masked prism-neutralised clinical cover test was performed for each of the conditions for comparison.
RESULTS: Closer viewing distance resulted in greater exophoria for both children and adults (p < 0.001). Phorias were similar for adults and children for each viewing distance and target, with mean differences of less than 2 prism dioptres (pd). Overall, the average PowerRefractor phorias (pooled across protocols) for adults were 1.3, 2.3 and 3.8 pd exophoria and for children were 0.1 pd esophoria, 0.94 and 3.8 pd exophoria for the 6 m, 1 m and 40 cm distances respectively. The corresponding clinical cover test values were 0.7, 1.9, and 4.1 pd exophoria for adults and 0, 1.5 and 3.3 pd exophoria for the children. Refractive states were also similar (≤0.5 D difference) for viewing the Lea symbols or movie for any protocol tested.
CONCLUSIONS: Phoria estimation can be challenging for a pre-school child. These data suggest that by 3-5 years of age objective eye-tracking measures in a typically developing group are adult-like at the range of distances tested, and that use of an animated movie produces similar average results to a small optotype (0.18 logMAR; Snellen 20/30 or 6/9).
© 2016 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2016 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heterophoria; target type; viewing distance; visual development

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27921322      PMCID: PMC5195916          DOI: 10.1111/opo.12342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  31 in total

1.  Near visual function in young children. Part I: Near point of convergence. Part II: Amplitude of accommodation. Part III: Near heterophoria.

Authors:  A H Chen; D J O'Leary; E R Howell
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Normal values and standard deviations for pupil diameter and interpupillary distance in subjects aged 1 month to 19 years.

Authors:  Colleen MacLachlan; Howard C Howland
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  The variation of phoria with age.

Authors:  M J HIRSCH; M ALPERN; H L SCHULTZ
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1948-11

4.  Prevalence of heterophoria and associations with refractive error, heterotropia and ethnicity in Australian school children.

Authors:  Jody F Leone; Elaine Cornell; Ian G Morgan; Paul Mitchell; Annette Kifley; Jie Jin Wang; Kathryn A Rose
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Vergence and accommodation system in malay primary school children.

Authors:  Ai Hong Chen; Ahmad Hakimi Zainol Abidin
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2002-01

6.  Laboratory, clinical, and kindergarten test of a new eccentric infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor).

Authors:  M Choi; S Weiss; F Schaeffel; A Seidemann; H C Howland; B Wilhelm; H Wilhelm
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.

Authors:  D J Field
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  A quantitative analysis of eye movements during the cover test--a preliminary report.

Authors:  N A Barnard; W D Thomson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Physiological exophoria.

Authors:  B E Freier; L D Pickwell
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Association of symptoms with measures of oculomotor deficiencies.

Authors:  J E Sheedy; J J Saladin
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1978-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  Fixational saccades are more disconjugate in adults than in children.

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh; Fatema F Ghasia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Vision Development Differences between Slow and Fast Motor Development in Typical Developing Toddlers: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Elena Pinero-Pinto; Verónica Pérez-Cabezas; Concepción De-Hita-Cantalejo; Carmen Ruiz-Molinero; Estanislao Gutiérrez-Sánchez; José-Jesús Jiménez-Rejano; José-María Sánchez-González; María Carmen Sánchez-González
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Synchronization of a Removable Optical Element with an Eye Tracker: Test Case for Heterophoria Measurement.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Avi Caspi
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  An automated and objective cover test to measure heterophoria.

Authors:  Clara Mestre; Carles Otero; Fernando Díaz-Doutón; Josselin Gautier; Jaume Pujol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.