| Literature DB >> 27920842 |
Yoshiyuki Ozawa1, Masaki Hara2, Motoo Nakagawa1, Yuta Shibamoto1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preoperative evaluation of invasion to the adjacent organs is important for the thymic epithelial tumors on CT. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the utility of electrocardiography (ECG)-gated CT for assessing thymic epithelial tumors with regard to the motion artifacts produced and the preoperative diagnostic accuracy of the technique. MATERIAL/Entities:
Keywords: Artifacts; Mediastinum; Thymoma
Year: 2016 PMID: 27920842 PMCID: PMC5125750 DOI: 10.12659/PJR.898242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Radiol ISSN: 1733-134X
Accuracy of the techniques for assessing tumor invasion into adjacent structures.
| n | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mediastinal fat | 40 | |||||
| Non-ECG-gated | 96 | 67 | 83 | 91 | 85 | |
| ECG-gated | 96 | 87 | 92 | 93 | 93 | |
| Pericardium | 39 | |||||
| Non-ECG-gated | 43 | 88 | 43 | 88 | 79 | |
| ECG-gated | 86 | 97 | 86 | 97 | 95 | |
| SVC and BV | 23 | |||||
| Non-ECG-gated | 67 | 88 | 67 | 88 | 83 | |
| ECG-gated | 67 | 100 | 100 | 89 | 91 | |
| Aorta and PA | 38 | |||||
| Non-ECG-gated | – | 100 | – | 100 | 100 | |
| ECG-gated | – | 100 | – | 100 | 100 | |
| Lungs | 39 | |||||
| Non-ECG-gated | 78 | 80 | 54 | 92 | 79 | |
| ECG-gated | 78 | 97 | 88 | 94 | 92 |
Figures are shown as percentages. BV – brachiocephalic vein; SVC – superior vena cava; PA – pulmonary artery; PPV – positive predictive value; NPV – negative predictive value.
Figure 1Non-ECG-gated (A) CT and ECG-gated (B) CT of a 53-year-old woman with thymoma. Her Masaoka stage was I. On non-ECG-gated and ECG-gated CT, the degree of motion artifacts was judged as fair and good, respectively. The border between the tumor and pericardium on non-ECG-gated CT was not clear (open arrow) because of motion artifacts, while that on ECG-gated CT was clear (arrow). Blurring border at the pericardium mimicked irregular tumor contour on non-ECG-gated CT. Pericardial invasion was considered to be present on non-ECG-gated CT and absent on ECG-gated CT. Surgical and pathological assessments did not detect any pericardial invasion; i.e., ECG-gated CT allowed a correct assessment to be made.
Degree of motion artifacts.
| Degree of motion artifacts | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | Slight | Marked | ||
| Mediastinal fat | ||||
| Non-ECG-gated | 11 | 23 | 6 | |
| ECG-gated | 35 | 5 | 0 | <0.0001 |
| Pericardium | ||||
| Non-ECG-gated | 2 | 25 | 13 | |
| ECG-gated | 27 | 13 | 0 | <0.0001 |
| SVC and BV | ||||
| Non-ECG-gated | 19 | 21 | 0 | |
| ECG-gated | 37 | 3 | 0 | <0.0001 |
| Aorta | ||||
| Non-ECG-gated | 1 | 16 | 23 | |
| ECG-gated | 21 | 19 | 0 | <0.0001 |
| Lungs | ||||
| Non-ECG-gated | 20 | 15 | 5 | |
| ECG-gated | 30 | 10 | 0 | 0.0089 |
BV – brachiocephalic vein; SVC – superior vena cava.
Figure 2Non-ECG-gated (A) CT and ECG-gated (B) CT of a 78-year-old woman with thymoma, which had invaded the mediastinal fat and lungs and exhibited pleural dissemination. Her Masaoka stage was IVa. On non-ECG-gated and ECG-gated CT, the degree of motion artifacts was poor and good, respectively. The border between the tumor and pulmonary artery on non-ECG-gated CT was not clear (open arrow) because of motion artifacts, while that on ECG-gated CT was clear (arrow) and ECG-gated CT depicted the linear fat tissue between the tumor and pulmonary artery. Pulmonary artery invasion was judged to be absent on both types of CT. Surgical and pathological assessments did not reveal any invasion into the pulmonary artery; i.e., both techniques allowed correct assessments to be made. However, it was easier to diagnose invasion on ECG-gated CT than non-ECG-gated CT.