Literature DB >> 27920121

Is knowledge translation without patient or community engagement flawed?

Vivian R Ramsden1, Norma Rabbitskin2, John M Westfall3, Maret Felzien4, Janice Braden5, Jessica Sand6.   

Abstract

Background: The engagement of patients/individuals and/or communities has become increasingly important in all aspects of the research process. Objective: The aim of this manuscript is to begin the discussion about the use and implementation of authentic engagement in the development of presentations and manuscripts which evolve from research that has engaged patients/individuals and/or communities.
Methods: Community-Based Participatory Research; Transformative Action Research. Results and Discussion: In Canada, the framework for engaging patients/individuals and/or communities is clearly outlined in Chapter 9 of the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans which indicates that when research projects involving First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples, the peoples in these communities are to have a role in shaping/co-creating the research that affects them. It is increasingly important that presentations and manuscripts that evolve from results/findings which have engaged patients/individuals and/or communities be co-presented/co-published. Presentations are often done without patients/individuals and/or communities and manuscripts published with only academic authors. Frequently, grants submitted and subsequently funded do not consider this aspect of the process in the budget which makes integrated and outcome knowledge translation, dissemination and distribution by and with patients/individuals and/or communities difficult to facilitate. Conclusions: This manuscript was designed to begin the discussion at various levels related to authentic engagement in the development of presentations and manuscripts which evolve from research that has engaged patients/individuals and/or communities. How will you include patients/individuals and/or communities in your presentations and publications?
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Communities; community-based participatory research; health equity; health promotion; knowledge translation patients.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27920121     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  5 in total

1.  NAPCRG Patient and Clinician Engagement: From Idea to Program to Board Membership.

Authors:  Kirk Mason; Arturo Martinez-Guijosa
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.707

2.  Experiences of using the i-PARIHS framework: a co-designed case study of four multi-site implementation projects.

Authors:  S C Hunter; B Kim; A Mudge; L Hall; A Young; P McRae; A L Kitson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Using qualitative Health Research methods to improve patient and public involvement and engagement in research.

Authors:  Danielle E Rolfe; Vivian R Ramsden; Davina Banner; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2018-12-13

4.  Exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Elena Koskinas; Meghan Gilfoyle; Jon Salsberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 5.  Enhancing health and wellness by, for and with Indigenous youth in Canada: a scoping review.

Authors:  Udoka Okpalauwaekwe; Clifford Ballantyne; Scott Tunison; Vivian R Ramsden
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.135

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.