Literature DB >> 27920019

Personalized Diabetes Management Using Electronic Medical Records.

Dimitris Bertsimas1, Nathan Kallus2, Alexander M Weinstein2, Ying Daisy Zhuo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Current clinical guidelines for managing type 2 diabetes do not differentiate based on patient-specific factors. We present a data-driven algorithm for personalized diabetes management that improves health outcomes relative to the standard of care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We modeled outcomes under 13 pharmacological therapies based on electronic medical records from 1999 to 2014 for 10,806 patients with type 2 diabetes from Boston Medical Center. For each patient visit, we analyzed the range of outcomes under alternative care using a k-nearest neighbor approach. The neighbors were chosen to maximize similarity on individual patient characteristics and medical history that were most predictive of health outcomes. The recommendation algorithm prescribes the regimen with best predicted outcome if the expected improvement from switching regimens exceeds a threshold. We evaluated the effect of recommendations on matched patient outcomes from unseen data.
RESULTS: Among the 48,140 patient visits in the test set, the algorithm's recommendation mirrored the observed standard of care in 68.2% of visits. For patient visits in which the algorithmic recommendation differed from the standard of care, the mean posttreatment glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) under the algorithm was lower than standard of care by 0.44 ± 0.03% (4.8 ± 0.3 mmol/mol) (P < 0.001), from 8.37% under the standard of care to 7.93% under our algorithm (68.0 to 63.2 mmol/mol).
CONCLUSIONS: A personalized approach to diabetes management yielded substantial improvements in HbA1c outcomes relative to the standard of care. Our prototyped dashboard visualizing the recommendation algorithm can be used by providers to inform diabetes care and improve outcomes.
© 2017 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27920019     DOI: 10.2337/dc16-0826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  16 in total

1.  Predictive Accuracy of Heart Failure-Specific Risk Equations in an Electronic Health Record-Based Cohort.

Authors:  Aakash Bavishi; Matthew Bruce; Hongyan Ning; Priya M Freaney; Peter Glynn; Faraz S Ahmad; Clyde W Yancy; Sanjiv J Shah; Norrina B Allen; Suma X Vupputuri; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Sadiya S Khan
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Learning parametric policies and transition probability models of markov decision processes from data.

Authors:  Tingting Xu; Henghui Zhu; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis
Journal:  Eur J Control       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Improve Chronic Disease Care: Methods and Application to Pharmacotherapy Decision Support for Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Shinji Tarumi; Wataru Takeuchi; George Chalkidis; Salvador Rodriguez-Loya; Junichi Kuwata; Michael Flynn; Kyle M Turner; Farrant H Sakaguchi; Charlene Weir; Heidi Kramer; David E Shields; Phillip B Warner; Polina Kukhareva; Hideyuki Ban; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Electronic Health Record Driven Prediction for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Early Pregnancy.

Authors:  Hang Qiu; Hai-Yan Yu; Li-Ya Wang; Qiang Yao; Si-Nan Wu; Can Yin; Bo Fu; Xiao-Juan Zhu; Yan-Long Zhang; Yong Xing; Jun Deng; Hao Yang; Shun-Dong Lei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Understanding a Nonlinear Causal Relationship Between Rewards and Physicians' Contributions in Online Health Care Communities: Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Jying-Nan Wang; Ya-Ling Chiu; Haiyan Yu; Yuan-Teng Hsu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Machine learning provides evidence that stroke risk is not linear: The non-linear Framingham stroke risk score.

Authors:  Agni Orfanoudaki; Emma Chesley; Christian Cadisch; Barry Stein; Amre Nouh; Mark J Alberts; Dimitris Bertsimas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Machine Learning to Predict Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Ling Sun; Wenwu Zhu; Xin Chen; Jianguang Jiang; Yuan Ji; Nan Liu; Yajing Xu; Yi Zhuang; Zhiqin Sun; Qingjie Wang; Fengxiang Zhang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-11-13

8.  Feasibility and acceptability of intensive, real-time biobehavioral data collection using ecological momentary assessment, salivary biomarkers, and accelerometers among middle-aged African Americans.

Authors:  Soohyun Nam; Genevieve F Dunton; Monica R Ordway; Garrett I Ash; Sangchoon Jeon; David Vlahov; Robin Whittemore; LaRon E Nelson; Rajita Sinha; Marcella Nunez-Smith; Douglas A Granger
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Learning Optimal Distributionally Robust Individualized Treatment Rules.

Authors:  Weibin Mo; Zhengling Qi; Yufeng Liu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 10.  State-of-the-Art Machine Learning Techniques Aiming to Improve Patient Outcomes Pertaining to the Cardiovascular System.

Authors:  Rahul Kumar Sevakula; Wan-Tai M Au-Yeung; Jagmeet P Singh; E Kevin Heist; Eric M Isselbacher; Antonis A Armoundas
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.