Literature DB >> 27919984

Clinical Significances of Preoperative Classification of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Different Characteristics of Perihilar vs. Peripheral ICC.

Yo-Ichi Yamashita1,2, Huanlin Wang3, Takeshi Kurihara3, Eiji Tsujita2, Akihiro Nishie4, Katsunori Imai5, Daisuke Hashimoto5, Akira Chikamoto5, Shinichi Aishima6, Hideo Baba5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of preoperative classification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) into perihilar and peripheral types using dynamic computed tomography (CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to analyze the differences in clinical characteristics between perihilar and peripheral ICC samples from patients between 1990-2014.
RESULTS: A total of 87 patients were divided into three ICC subtypes; perihilar (n=34), peripheral (n=44), and unclassifiable ICC (n=9). The positive rates of pathological lymphatic infiltration (ly) (p=0.02) and perineural invasion (pn) (p<0.0001) were significantly higher in perihilar ICC. There was no significant difference in the disease-free survival rate (p=0.2268); however, the overall survival rate of perihilar ICC was significantly worse (p=0.0031). The rate of systemic recurrence (>3 nodules) was significantly higher in perihilar ICC (p=0.0135).
CONCLUSION: In perihilar ICC, the local tumor invasions such as ly and pn were more frequent. Therefore, it is important in such cases to attempt to achieve a sufficient tumor margin. Systemic recurrences were more frequent in perihilar ICC, so perioperative chemotherapy should be conducted as well. Copyright
© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; perihilar type; peripheral type

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27919984     DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  4 in total

1.  Impact of tumor localization on the outcomes of surgery for an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tatsuya Orimo; Toshiya Kamiyama; Tomoko Mitsuhashi; Hirofumi Kamachi; Hideki Yokoo; Kenji Wakayama; Shingo Shimada; Akihisa Nagatsu; Akinobu Taketomi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  The Prognostic Impact of Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Following Curative Hepatectomy: A Retrospective Single Institution Study.

Authors:  Tatsunori Miyata; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Takaaki Higashi; Katsunobu Taki; Daisuke Izumi; Keisuke Kosumi; Ryuma Tokunaga; Shigeki Nakagawa; Hirohisa Okabe; Katsunori Imai; Daisuke Hashimoto; Akira Chikamoto; Hideo Baba
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis.

Authors:  Yuzo Umeda; Toshiharu Mitsuhashi; Toru Kojima; Daisuke Satoh; Kenta Sui; Yoshikatsu Endo; Masaru Inagaki; Masahiro Oishi; Takahito Yagi; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 3.149

4.  Prognostic factors predicting survival rate over 10 years of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after hepatic resection.

Authors:  Chung Hyeun Ma; Dae Wook Hwang; Ki Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Sang Hyun Shin; Jae Hoon Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 1.859

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.