Kyoichi Kaira1,2, Tetsuya Higuchi3, Noriaki Sunaga2, Yukiko Arisaka3, Takeshi Hisada2, Hideyuki Tominaga4, Noboru Oriuchi5, Takayuki Asao6, Yoshihito Tsushima3, Masanobu Yamada2. 1. Department of Oncology Clinical Development, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan kkaira1970@yahoo.co.jp oriuchi@fmu.ac.jp. 2. Department of Medicine and Molecular Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan. 3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear medicine, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan. 4. Advanced Clinical Research Center, Fukushima Global Medical Science Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan. 5. Advanced Clinical Research Center, Fukushima Global Medical Science Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan kkaira1970@yahoo.co.jp oriuchi@fmu.ac.jp. 6. Department of Oncology Clinical Development, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM: L-[3-18F]-α-methyl tyrosine (18F-FAMT) positron emission tomography (PET) has a high specificity for detecting malignant lesions. However, the usefulness of therapeutic monitoring of 18F-FAMT PET against advanced human neoplasms remains unclear. Here, we evaluated 18F-FAMT PET clinical significance regarding therapy response and outcome after systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer, compared to 18F-FDG PET. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with untreated advanced lung cancer received 18F-FAMT PET and 18F-FDG PET before and 4 weeks after one cycle of chemotherapy. Metabolic response (MR) was defined according to the PERCIST guideline. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were eligible for analysis on both PET scans. The histological type included 87 non-small cell lung cancers and 8 small-cell lung cancers. Post-treatment maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and MR on 18F-FAMT PET were correlated with tumor response. In all patients, post-treatment SUVmax of 18F-FDG and 18F-FAMT PET and MR of 18F-FAMT PET were statistically significant prognostic markers for predicting poor outcome by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed that MR on 18F-FAMT PET was a significant independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: MR on 18F-FAMT PET may be a potential parameter to predict the prognosis after first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer. Copyright
BACKGROUND/AIM: L-[3-18F]-α-methyl tyrosine (18F-FAMT) positron emission tomography (PET) has a high specificity for detecting malignant lesions. However, the usefulness of therapeutic monitoring of 18F-FAMT PET against advanced humanneoplasms remains unclear. Here, we evaluated 18F-FAMT PET clinical significance regarding therapy response and outcome after systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer, compared to 18F-FDG PET. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with untreated advanced lung cancer received 18F-FAMT PET and 18F-FDG PET before and 4 weeks after one cycle of chemotherapy. Metabolic response (MR) was defined according to the PERCIST guideline. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were eligible for analysis on both PET scans. The histological type included 87 non-small cell lung cancers and 8 small-cell lung cancers. Post-treatment maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and MR on 18F-FAMT PET were correlated with tumor response. In all patients, post-treatment SUVmax of 18F-FDG and 18F-FAMT PET and MR of 18F-FAMT PET were statistically significant prognostic markers for predicting poor outcome by univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed that MR on 18F-FAMT PET was a significant independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: MR on 18F-FAMT PET may be a potential parameter to predict the prognosis after first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer. Copyright