Literature DB >> 27919557

Trend shifts in satellite-derived vegetation growth in Central Eurasia, 1982-2013.

Hao-Jie Xu1, Xin-Ping Wang2, Tai-Bao Yang3.   

Abstract

Central Eurasian vegetation is critical for the regional ecological security and the global carbon cycle. However, climatic impacts on vegetation growth in Central Eurasia are uncertain. The reason for this uncertainty lies in the fact that the response of vegetation to climate change showed nonlinearity, seasonality and differences among plant functional types. Based on remotely sensed vegetation index and in-situ meteorological data for the years 1982-2013, in conjunction with the latest land cover type product, we analyzed how vegetation growth trend varied across different seasons and evaluated vegetation response to climate variables at regional, biome and pixel scales. We found a persistent increase in the growing season NDVI over Central Eurasia during 1982-1994, whereas this greening trend has stalled since the mid-1990s in response to increased water deficit. The stalled trend in the growing season NDVI was largely attributed by summer and autumn NDVI changes. Enhanced spring vegetation growth after 2002 was caused by rapid spring warming. The response of vegetation to climatic factors varied in different seasons. Precipitation was the main climate driver for the growing season and summer vegetation growth. Changes in temperature and precipitation during winter and spring controlled the spring vegetation growth. Autumn vegetation growth was mainly dependent on the vegetation growth in summer. We found diverse responses of different vegetation types to climate drivers in Central Eurasia. Forests were more responsive to temperature than to precipitation. Grassland and desert vegetation responded more strongly to precipitation than to temperature in summer but more strongly to temperature than to precipitation in spring. In addition, the growth of desert vegetation was more dependent on winter precipitation than that of grasslands. This study has important implications for improving the performance of terrestrial ecosystem models to predict future vegetation response to climate change.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drought; Dryland vegetation; Nonlinearity; Plant functional type; Seasonality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27919557     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Vegetation Responses to Climate Change and Anthropogenic Activity in China, 1982 to 2018.

Authors:  Jie Li; Mengfei Xi; Lijun Wang; Ning Li; Huawei Wang; Fen Qin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Quantitative analysis of vegetation restoration and potential driving factors in a typical subalpine region of the Eastern Tibet Plateau.

Authors:  Yu Feng; Juan Wang; Qin Zhou; Maoyang Bai; Peihao Peng; Dan Zhao; Zengyan Guan; Xian'an Liu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  Response of grassland productivity to climate change and anthropogenic activities in arid regions of Central Asia.

Authors:  Xu Bi; Bo Li; Lixin Zhang; Bo Nan; Xinshi Zhang; Zihan Yang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Examining long-term natural vegetation dynamics in the Aral Sea Basin applying the linear spectral mixture model.

Authors:  Yiting Su; Dongchuan Wang; Shuang Zhao; Jiancong Shi; Yanqing Shi; Dongying Wei
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Variation and Driving Mechanism of Ecological Environment Quality in the Arid Regions of Central Asia, Xinjiang.

Authors:  Xu Bi; Bianrong Chang; Fen Hou; Zihan Yang; Qi Fu; Bo Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.